The influences of posterior tibial slope on the knee kinematics have been reported in both TKA and UKA. We hypothesized the posterior tibial slope (PTS) would affect the sagittal knee alignment after UKA. The influences of PTS on postoperative knee extension angle were investigated with routine lateral radiographies of the knee after UKA. Twenty-four patients (26 knees; 19 females, 7 males) underwent medial UKA were involved in this study. Average age was 74.8 ± 7.2 years. The mean preoperative active range of motion were − 4.1° ± 6.3°in extension and 123.2° ± 15.5° in flexion. All UKAs were performed using fixed bearing type UKA (Zimmer Biomet, ZUK), with adjusting the posterior slope of the proximal tibial bone cut according to the original geometry of the tibia. Routine lateral radiographies of the knee were examined preoperatively, 6 months after the surgery. PTS and knee extension angles with maximal active knee extension (mEXT) and one-leg standing (sEXT) were radiographically measured. We used the fibular shaft axis (FSA) for the sagittal mechanical axis of the tibia. PTS was defined as the angle between the medial tibial plateau and the perpendicular axis of FSA. Extension angles (mEXT and sEXT) were defined as the angles between FSA and distal femoral shaft axis (positive value for hyperextension). The changes of PTS and the influences of PTS on sEXT at each time period were analyzed using simple linear regression analysis (p<0.05).Introduction
Materials & Methods
Patients-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been reported as the important methods to evaluate clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The patient satisfaction score in Knee Society Score (KSS-2011) has been used in the recent literatures. Patient satisfaction was subjective parameter, and would be affected by multiple factors including psychological factors and physical conditions at not only affected joint but also elsewhere in the body. The question was raised regarding the consistency of patient satisfaction score in KSS-2011 to other PROMs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation of patient satisfaction in KSS-2011 to other categories in KSS-2011 and to other PROMs including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and 25-questions in Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25). 83 patients over 65 years old with osteoarthritic knees were involved in this study. All patients underwent CR-TKAs (Persona CRR). The means and ranges of demographics were as follows: age; 74.5 years old (65–89), Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle; 12.4 (−6.2–22.5) in varus. We asked patients to fulfill the questionnaire including KSS-2011, FJS-12, EQ-5D and GLFS-25 at 1-year postoperative follow-up visit. KSS-2011 consisted of 4 categories of questions; patient satisfaction (PS), symptoms, patient expectations (PE), functional activities (FA). We evaluated the correlation of PS to other PROMs using simple linear regression analyses (p<0.001).Introduction
Material & Method
Although proximal tibia vara is physiologically and pathologically observed, it is difficult to measure the varus angle accurately and reproducibly due to inaccuracy of the radiograph because of rotational and/or torsional deformities. Since tibial coronal alignment in TKA gives influence on implant longevity, intra- or extra-medurally cutting guide should be set carefully especially in cases with severe tibia vara. In this context, we measured the proximal tibial varus angle by introducing 3D-coordinate system. Three-dimensional models of 32 tibiae (23 females, 9 males, 71.2 ± 7.8 y/o) were reconstructed from CT data of the patients undergoing CT-based navigation assisted TKA. Clinically relevant mid-sagittal plane is defined by proximal tibial antero-posterior axis and an apex of the tibial plafond. After the cross-sectional contours of the tibial canal were extracted, least-square lines were fitted to define the proximal diaphyseal and the metaphyseal anatomical axis. The proximal tibia vara was firstly investigated in terms of distribution of proximal anatomical axis exits at the joint surface. TVA1 and TVA2 were defined to be a project angle on the coronal plane between the metaphyseal tibial anatomical axis and the proximal diaphyseal anatomical axis, and that between the metaphyseal tibial anatomical axis and the tibial functional axis, respectively. The correlations of each angle with age and femoro-tibial angle (FTA) were also examined. The proximal anatomical axis exits distributed 4.3 ± 1.7 mm medially and 17.1 ± 3.4 mm anteriorly. TVA1 and TVA2 were 12.5 ± 4.5°(4.4?23.0°) and 11.8 ± 4.4° (4.4?22.0°), respectively. The correlations of FTA with TVA1 (r=0.374, p<0.05) and TVA2 (r=0.439, p<0.05) were statistically significant.Materials & Methods
Results
Although optimal alignment is essential for improved function and implant longevity after TKA, we have less bony landmarks of tibia relative to femur. Trans-malleolar axis (TMA) is a reference line of distal tibia in the axial plane, which externally rotated relative to a ML axis of proximal tibia. We originally defined another reference axis associated with the orientation of tibial plafond, and then measured tibial torsion in the 3D-coordinate system. Three-dimensional CAD models of 20 tibiae were reconstructed based on pre-operative CT data from OA patients (16 females and 4 males, 73.8 ± 6.9 years old). TMA was a line connecting each apex of medial and lateral malleolus. The plafond axis (PLA) that we originally defined in this study was a line connecting each midpoint of medial and lateral margin of talocrural facet. In terms of interobserver correlation coefficiency and mean errors of the designated points to define those axes, TMA was found out to be 0.982, 3.14 ± 0.47 mm (medial), and 0.988, 4.88 ± 0.59 mm (lateral). Those of PLA were 0.997, 1.97 ± 0.53 mm (medial), and 0.995, 2.02 ± 0.44 mm (lateral). The tibial torsion was 16.3 ± 6.3°with reference to TMA, and 10.2 ± 8.4°to PLA. Based on these results, as for the rotational reference axis in the axial plain of distal tibia, we consider the plafond axis to be another reliable and reproducible axis, which is expected to be applicable in preoperative planning in TKA to reduce outliers of coronal alignment.
