In the United Kingdom (UK), the fastest growing population demographic is the over 85 years of age, but despite this, outcomes achieved in the octogenarian population with a Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) are underrepresented in the literature. The Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, has an established patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) programme into which all patients are routinely enrolled. We aim to investigate the outcome of medial UKR using the oxford phase 3 implant in octogenarians. We retrospectively reviewed our database for patients aged 60–89 years, who underwent a medial unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) using the oxford phase 3 implant, between June 2007-December 2012 (N=395). The patients were stratified into 3 groups based on age, 60–69 (N=188), 70–79(N=149), and 80–89(N=58). Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), Euro-quol (EQ-5D) scores, revision rates, and mortality were compared.Background
Methods
Despite an ageing population and a rise in the number of joint replacements being performed, the mean age of patients undergoing surgery remains static. One explanation for this is continued concern over the risks of performing surgery on the very elderly. We aim to investigate the outcome of Total Knee Replacement (TKR) in a nonagenarian population. The Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom has an established patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) programme into which all patients are routinely enrolled. We retrospectively reviewed our data set for a cohort of nonagenarians undergoing primary TKR, between April 2008 and October 2011. Post-operative complications, mortality rates and functional outcomes were compared to those of a time matched 70–79 year old cohort. Only patients with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis were included whereas an exclusion criterion consisted of patients undergoing revision surgery, simultaneous bilateral replacements or conversion from a Unicompartmental Knee replacement.Background
Methods
The management of peri-prosthetic distal femur fractures following TKR (Total Knee Replacement) in the elderly remains a challenge with little or no consensus on the best available treatment. Various methods have been described in the management of these complex fractures. Our study compares the outcome and cost of distal femoral arthroplasty to that of Fixation (Plating/Retrograde Nailing). We retrospectively reviewed our database for patients admitted with peri-prosthetic distal femoral fractures between 2005–2013 (n=61). The patients were stratified into 2 groups based on method of management. The Distal Femoral Arthroplasty group (Group A) had 21 patients, with a mean age of 78 years (68–90. The Fixation group (Group B) had 40 patients, with a mean age of 74 years, 23 of those had plating of the fracture, while 17 had a retrograde nail inserted. Pain scores, Length of stay, intra-operative blood loss, and weight bearing status, were compared. Functional outcomes were also assessed using Oxford knee scores, KSS scores, VAS pain assessment and range of motion from last follow up appointment. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Cost analysis was done for both groups, which included implant costs, consumable costs (man power included), theatre utilisation time and length of hospital stay. The calculation was done based on the PbR (payment by results) system and “best practise tariffs 2010–11” utilised by the NHS (National Health Service) in England.Introduction
Methods
Despite an ageing population and a rise in the number of joint replacements being performed, the mean age of patients undergoing surgery remains static. One explanation for this is continued concern over the risks of performing surgery on the very elderly. The Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom has an established patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) programme into which all patients are routinely enrolled. Post-operative complications, Oxford scores and Euro-Quol (EQ5-D) are collected to the second post-operative year. We retrospectively reviewed our data set for a cohort of nonagenarians undergoing primary total hip replacement (THR) between April 2008 and October 2011. Post-operative complications, mortality rates and functional outcomes were compared to those of a time matched 70–79 year old cohort. Only patients with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis were included whereas an exclusion criterion consisted of patients undergoing revision surgery, simultaneous bilateral replacements or conversion from a dynamic hip screw. We identified 38 nonagenarian patients (12 men and 26 women), with a mean age of 92.18 (90–99) and the control group consisted of 55 patients (21 men and 34 women), with a mean age of 74.69 (70–79). We found that nonagenarians requiring a THR presented with lower pre-operative Oxford Hip Score (OHS) (p=0.02) but made a greater improvement in the first post-operative year than the younger cohort (p=0.040). The nonagenarians had a greater risk of requiring a blood transfusion following THR (p= 0.0265; CI 1.11 to 5.75), and also required a longer stay than their younger counterparts (p=0.001). Mortality rates were higher in the nonagenarian cohort, but these were in keeping with the life expectancy projections identified by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).Introduction
Methods and Results
