To evaluate the effect of hydroxyapatite coating, two same shape cementless stems were compared in this randomized control trial study. Between May 2003 and February 2010, 88 patients had a primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with two different types of cementless stems. Forty-three patients had Proarc stems (P group) (Kyocera Medical, Osaka, Japan), and Forty-five patients had Proarc HA stems (HA group) (Kyocera Medical, Osaka, Japan) which was coated with thin (20 micrometer) hydroxyapatite on Proarc rough porous coating. Gender distribution, average age at surgery, average weight and average follow-up period were same in the two groups. The average follow-up period was 8.5 years (range, 5 to 13 years). The average age at the time of surgery was 63 years. Porous acetabular shells and highly crosslinked polyethylene liners made by Kyocera Medical corporation were implanted into all hips. Stems were implanted with a modified Hardinge surgical approach without trochanteric osteotomy. Harris Hip Score was used for clinical evaluation. Post-op radiographs of these patients were evaluated. Fisher's exact probability test was used for statistical analysis. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.Introduction
Methods
Our principle is to bring the socket back to the true acetabulum position. A large structural bone graft is required for severe subluxation. We obtained good long-term results with structural bone grafts. It is necessary to evaluate the bone graft 3 dimensionally, not 2 dimensionally. We evaluated our 305 primary THAs operated from April 2010 to Mar 2014. Structural bone grafts were utilized on the acetabulum in 39 cases (12.8%). We measured the CE angle on post-operative plain coronal x-rays. 3D-CT evaluation was carried out on the cases with CE angles of 0 degrees or less. We checked the position of the graft and see how much surface area the graft occupies of the total area that receives the load.Objectives
M and M
