The deformity in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee has been evaluated mainly in the frontal plane two dimensional X-ray using femorotibial angle. Although the presence of underlying rotational deformity in the varus knee and coexisting hip abnormality in the valgus knee have been suggested, three dimensional (3D) deformities in the varus and valgus knee were still unknown. We evaluated the 3D deformities of the varus and valgus knee using 3D bone models. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of twenty seven OA knees (fifteen varus and twelve valgus) undergoing total knee arthroplasty were assessed in this study. CT scans of each patient's femur and tibia, with a 2 mm interval, obtained before surgery. We created the 3D digital model of the femur and tibia using visualization and modeling software developed in our institution. The femoral coordinate system was calculated by the 3D mechanical axis and clinical transepicondylar axis and the tibial coordinate system was calculated by the 3D mechanical axis and Akagi's line. The 3D deformities of the knee were determined by the relative position of the femorotibial coordinate system, and described by the tibial position relative to the femur. The anteversion of the femoral neck were calculated to evaluate the relationship between the valgus knee and hip region.Introduction
Methods
Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) preservation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is adovocated on the grounds that it provides better restoration of knee joint kinematics as opposed to PCL sacrifice. Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee prostheses have been in the market for a long time, but the PFC-Sigma Rotating Platform (RP) prosthesis (DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, Warsaw, Ind) has been introduced in the market since 2000. Since, little is known about the in vivo kinematics of MB prostheses especially with cruciate retaining (CR). The objective of this study is to investigate the in vivo kinematics of MB RP-CR total knee arthroplasty during weight-bearing deep knee bending motion. We investigated the in vivo knee kinematics of 20 knees (17 patients) implanted with PFC-Sigma RP-CR. All TKAs were judged clinically successful (Hospital for Special Surgery scores >90), with no ligamentous laxity or pain. Mean patient age at the time of operation was 78.0 ± 6.0 years. Mean period between operation and surveillance was 15.0 ± 9.0 months. Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient did a wight-bearing deep knee bending motion. Femorotibial motion was analyzed using 2D/3D registration technique, which uses computer-assisted design (CAD) models to reproduce the spatial position of the femoral, tibial components from single-view fluoroscopic images. We evaluated the range of motion, axial rotation, and antero-posterior (AP) translation of the nearest point between the femoral and tibial component.Introduction
Patients and methods
Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee prostheses have been developed to achieve lower contact stress and higher conformity compared to fixed-bearing total knee prostheses. However, little is known about the in vivo kinematics of MB prostheses especially the motion of the polyethylene insert (PE) during various daily performances. And the in vivo motion of the PE during stairs up and down has not been clarified. The objective of this study is to clarify the in vivo motion of MB total knee arthroplasty including the PE during stairs up and down. We investigated the in vivo knee kinematics of 11 knees (10 patients) implanted with PFC-Sigma RP-F (DePuy). Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient did stairs up and down motion. And motion between each component was analyzed using two- to three-dimensional registration technique, which used computer-assisted design (CAD) models to reproduce the spatial position of the femoral, tibial components, and PE (implanted with four tantalum beads intra-operatively) from single-view fluoroscopic images. We evaluated the range of motion between the femoral and tibial components during being grounded, axial rotation between the femoral component and PE, the femoral and tibial component, and the PE and tibial component during being grounded.Background
Patients and methods
