Symptomatic spinal stenosis is a very common problem, and decompression surgery has been shown to be superior to nonoperative treatment in selected patient groups. However, performing an instrumented fusion in addition to decompression may avoid revision and improve outcomes. The aim of the SpInOuT feasibility study was to establish whether a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) that accounted for the spectrum of pathology contributing to spinal stenosis, including pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and mobile spondylolisthesis, could be conducted. As part of the SpInOuT-F study, a pilot randomized trial was carried out across five NHS hospitals. Patients were randomized to either spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected at baseline and three months. The intended sample size was 60 patients.Aims
Methods
Surgical site infections following spinal surgery profoundly influence continued treatment, significantly impacting psychological and economic dimensions and clinical outcomes. Its reported incidence varies up to 20%, with the highest incidence amongst neuromuscular scoliosis and metastatic cord compression patients. We describe the first reported biphasic osteoconductive scaffold (Cerament G) with a logarithmic elution profile as a cumulative strategic treatment modality for adjacent spinal surgery infections. All patients who developed surgical site infections following instrumented fusion (May 2021-December 2021) had their demographics (age, sex), type and number of procedures, isolated organism, antibiotics given, comorbidities, and WHO performance status analysed. The infected wound was debrided to healthy planes, samples taken, and Cerament g applied. Thirteen patients were treated for deep SSI following spinal instrumentation and fusion procedures with intraoperative Cerament G application. There were four males and nine females with an average age of 40 ranging between 12 and 87. Nine patients underwent initial surgery for spinal deformity, and four were treated for fractures as index procedure. 77% of infections were attributable to MSSA and Cutibacteriousm acnes; others included Klebsiella, Pseudomonas and Streptococcus and targeted with multimodal cumulative therapy. A WHO performance score improved in 11 patients. In addition, there was no wound leak, and infection was eradicated successfully in 12/13 with a single procedure. This series shows the successful eradication of the infection and improved functional outcomes with Cerament G. However, the low numbers of patients in our series are an essential consideration for the broader applicability of this device.
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the performance
and safety of magnetically controlled growth rods in the treatment
of early onset scoliosis. Secondary aims were to evaluate the clinical
outcome, the rate of further surgery, the rate of complications,
and the durability of correction. We undertook an observational prospective cohort study of children
with early onset scoliosis, who were recruited over a one-year period
and followed up for a minimum of two years. Magnetically controlled
rods were introduced in a standardized manner with distractions
performed three-monthly thereafter. Adverse events which were both related
and unrelated to the device were recorded. Ten children, for whom
relevant key data points (such as demographic information, growth
parameters, Cobb angles, and functional outcomes) were available,
were recruited and followed up over the period of the study. There
were five boys and five girls. Their mean age was 6.2 years (2.5
to 10).Aims
Patients and Methods
We undertook a prospective non-randomised radiological study
to evaluate the preliminary results of using magnetically-controlled
growing rods (MAGEC System, Ellipse technology) to treat children
with early-onset scoliosis. Between January 2011 and January 2015, 19 children were treated
with magnetically-controlled growing rods (MCGRs) and underwent
distraction at three-monthly intervals. The mean age of our cohort
was 9.1 years (4 to 14) and the mean follow-up 22.4 months (5.1
to 35.2). Of the 19 children, eight underwent conversion from traditional growing
rods. Whole spine radiographs were carried out pre- and post-operatively:
image intensification was used during each lengthening in the outpatient
department. The measurements evaluated were Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis,
proximal junctional kyphosis and spinal growth from T1 to S1.Aims
Patients and Methods
The Magnetic Expansion Control Rod Device (Magec) allows controlled distraction of the immature spine for the treatment of early onset scoliosis. There disparity between the reported distraction on the external adjustment device (EAD) and true distraction achieved has not been commented on to date. This study aims to determine the disparity between ‘true’ (T) and ‘apparent’ (A) distraction. Our secondary aim was to assess truncal growth and development. Thirteen patients underwent an average of 4.4 (3–6) three monthly distractions. The amount of true distraction was determined by measuring the expansion gap on radiographs using the width of the rod as a conversion factor to allow for magnification. The total distraction to date was compared to the amount reported on the EAD. Sitting and standing heights were recorded at each distraction.Aim:
Methods:
A systematic review of the current literature to address the debate of the optimal surgical approach for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). All studies comparing anterior open instrumented surgery with posterior instrumented surgery in patients with AIS, written in English and published up until February 2010 were included. Electronic databases searched included Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane database using “AIS” and “surgery” as key words. Outcome measures considered to be important were specifically identified in each paper included: Blood loss (ml); operation time (mins); hospital stay (days); curve correction (sagittal and coronal); number of fused levels; pulmonary function, and complications.Study Purpose
Method
The use of the dynamic hip screw is common practice for the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. The success of this procedure requires accurate guide wire placement. This can prove difficult at times and can result in repeated attempts leading to longer operating time, multiple tracks and more importantly greater radiation exposure to both patient and operating staff. We hypothesised that rather than using the standard anterior-posterior projected image (Figure 1) of a proximal femur, rotating the intensifier image (Figure 2) so that the guide wire appears to pass vertically makes it easier to visualise the projected direction of the guide wire. Fifty Specialist Registrars, thirty participating in the London hip meeting 2009, ten from Oxford and ten from Northern deanery orthopaedic rotations were involved in the study. They were presented with standard AP and rotated images of the femoral neck on paper using 135 degree template to replicate the DHS guide. The participants were asked to mark the entry point on the intertrochanteric area of femur on the image where they would have placed the guide wire. They did this on both standard AP and rotated images aiming for the centre of the head of the femur. Fig. 1 Standard AP image Fig. 2 Rotated imageIntroduction
Methods
We evaluated the cost and consequences of proximal femoral fractures requiring further surgery because of complications. The data were collected prospectively in a standard manner from all patients with a proximal femoral fracture presenting to the trauma unit at the John Radcliffe Hospital over a five-year period. The total cost of treatment for each patient was calculated by separating it into its various components. The risk factors for the complications that arose, the location of their discharge and the mortality rates for these patients were compared to those of a matched control group. There were 2360 proximal femoral fractures in 2257 patients, of which 144 (6.1%) required further surgery. The mean cost of treatment in patients with complications was £18 709 (£2606.30 to £60.827.10), compared with £8610 (£918.54 to £45 601.30) for uncomplicated cases (p <
0.01), with a mean length of stay of 62.8 (44.5 to 79.3) and 32.7 (23.8 to 35.0) days, respectively. The probability of mortality after one month in these cases was significantly higher than in the control group, with a mean survival of 209 days, compared with 496 days for the controls. Patients with complications were statistically less likely to return to their own home (p <
0.01). Greater awareness and understanding are required to minimise the complications of proximal femoral fractures and consequently their cost.
