Metal on metal hip arthroplasty continues to be controversial. Emerging evidence suggests that there are multiple modes of failure, and that the results of revision surgery are influenced by host and implant factors. This study compares a single surgeon series of hip resurfacings (Birmingham Hip Resurfacing {BHR}) and large diameter metal on metal total hip replacements (LDMOMTHR). Primary outcome measures included survival rates, failure secondary to histologically identified Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris (ARMD), and patient reported outcome measures (Oxford Hip Score {OHS}) following revision. Between 1999 and 2005, 458 BHR and 175 LDMOMTHR were performed. At latest review 43 BHR's (9.4%) and 28 LDMOMTHR's (14%) have been revised.Introduction
Methods
Pseudotumour formation is being reported with increasing frequency in failing metal-on-metal hip resurfacings and replacements. This mode of failure complication has also been reported with metal-on-polyethylene bearing bearings when it is usually associated with evidence of surface corrosion and no apparent wear at the head–neck taper. We present a case with evidence of taper wear and damage secondary to corrosion in an uncemented total hip replacement with a metal on polyethylene articulation (TMZF (Titanium, Molybdenum, Zirconium and Ferrous) Accolade® stem, Trident® HA coated acetabular shell, Low Friction Ion Treatment (LFIT™) Cobalt-Chrome anatomic head (40 mm), X3® polyethylene liner) A 69 year old woman had a THR in 2008. A year later she started to complain of lateral based hip pain. Clinical examination and initial imaging indicated trochanteric bursitis and heterotopic bone formation. The symptoms became worse over the next 3 years and the patient was listed for exploration and excision of heterotopic bone. Extensive pseudotumour was encountered deep to bursa and adherent to capsule. Abductors, external rotators and vastus lateralis were spared. There was minimal calcar osteolysis and marginal erosion in superior acetabulum. There was no obvious wear on the articulating surfaces of the femoral head and polyethylene inlay of the socket nor was there any evidence of neck-to-rim impingement or edge loading. There was visible blackening of both the taper and trunnion after femoral head removal.Case
Surgical findings
