Wear of polyethylene tibial inserts has been cited as being responsible for up to 25% of revision surgeries, imposing a very significant cost burden on the health care system and increasing patient risk. Accurate measurement of material loss from retrieved knee bearings presents difficult challenges because gravimetric methods are not useful with retrievals and unworn reference dimensions are often unavailable. Geometry and the local anatomy restrict in vivo radiographic wear analysis, and no large-scale analyses have illuminated long-term comparative wear rates and their dependence on design and patient factors. Our study of a large retrieval archive of knee inserts indicates that abrasive/adhesive wear of polyethylene inserts, both on the articular surface and on the backside of modular knees is an important contributor to wear, generation of debris and integrity of locking geometry. The objective of the current study is to quantify wear performance of tibial inserts in a large archive of retrieved knees of different designs. By assessing wear in a large and diverse series, the goal is to discern the effect on wear performance of a number of different factors: patient factors that might help guide treatment, knee design factors and bearing material factors that may inform a surgeon's choice from among the array of arthroplasty device options. An IRB approved retrieval database was queried for TKA designs implanted between 1997 and 2017. 1385 devices from 5 TKA designs were evaluated. Damage was ranked according to Hood's method, oxidation was determined through FTIR, and wear was determined through direct measurement of retrieved inserts using a previously established protocol. Design features (e.g. materials, conformity, locking mechanisms, stabilization, etc.) and patient demographics (e.g. age, weight, BMI, etc.) were cataloged. Multivariate analysis was performed to isolate factors contributing to wear, oxidation, and damage.Introduction
Methods
