Periprosthetic osteolysis is the most common long-term complication of a total joint arthroplasty, often resulting in aseptic loosening of the implant. As we aim at developing a safe and minimally invasive implant refixation procedure, thorough characterisation of the properties of the periprosthetic tissue is needed. In this pilot study, the periprosthetic tissue of eleven patients undergoing hip revision surgery due to aseptic loosening was obtained. Histology, confocal microscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and nanoindentation were performed to structurally and mechanically characterise the tissue. The study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Leiden University Medical Center.Background
Methods
Aseptic loosening of prostheses is the most common cause for failure in total joint arthroplasty. Particulate wear debris induces a non-stop inflammatory-like response resulting in the formation of a layer of fibrous periprosthetic tissue at the bone/implant interface. The current treatment is an invasive revision joint replacement surgery. However, this procedure has a high morbidity rate, therefore, a less invasive alternative is necessary. One approach could be to re-establish osseointegration of the joint prosthesis by inducing osteoblast differentiation in the periprosthetic tissue. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the capacity of periprosthetic tissue cells to differentiate into the osteoblast lineage. Periprosthetic tissue samples were collected during revision surgery of aseptic loosened hip prostheses, after which cells were isolated by collagenase digestion. Of 14 different donors, cells from passage 1 till 3 were used for differentiation experiments. During 21 days, cells were cultured under normal and several osteogenic culture conditions. Cultures were stained for alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and mineral deposits in the extracellular matrix.Background
Methods
Whether it is best to retain the posterior cruciate ligament in the degenerated knee, i.e. using a cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee prosthesis (TKP), or to use a more constraint posterior-stabilized (PS) TKP is of debate. There are limited studies comparing the effect of both methods on implant fixation and clinical outcome, leaving it up to the surgeon to base this decision on anything but conclusive evidence. We assessed the effect of two different philosophies in knee arthroplasty on clinical outcome and tibial component migration measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), by directly comparing the CR and PS version of an otherwise similarly designed cemented TKP. Sixty patients were randomized and received a Triathlon TKP (Stryker, NJ, USA) of either CR (n=30) or PS (n=30) design. RSA measurements (primary outcome) and clinical scores including the Knee Society Score and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were evaluated at baseline, at three months postoperatively and at one, two, five and seven years. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyse the repeated measurements. Both groups showed a similar implant migration pattern, with a maximum total point motion at seven years follow-up of around 0.8 mm of migration (mean difference between groups 95% CI −0.11 to 0.15mm, p=0.842). Two components (one of each group) were considered to have an increased risk of aseptic loosening. Both groups improved equally after surgery on the KSS and KOOS scores and no differences were seen during the seven years of follow-up. No differences in implant migration nor clinical results were seen seven years after cruciate-retaining compared to posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses.
In this study we validate that weight-bearing images are needed for accurate polyethylene liner wear measurement in total knee prostheses by measuring the difference in minimum joint space width between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing RSA views. Recent studies show that Model-based Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis is superior to the conventional in vivo measurements of polyethylene liner wear in total knee prostheses. Although it is generally postulated that weight-bearing (standing) views are required to detect liner wear, most RSA images are acquired in non-weight-bearing (supine) view for practical reasons. Therefore, it would be of interest to know if supine views would be sufficient for measuring TKA liner wear, defined as a change in minimum joint space width (mJSW). As a difference in mJSW between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing RSA images has never been validated, the aim of this study is to compare the outcome of in vivo measurements of mJSW in total knee prosthesis when conducted with weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing RSA views.Summary
Introduction
