Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is a conservative option for degenerative disease, with mobile (Oxford UKR) and fixed bearing (Physica ZUK) the most commonly used devices. The primary reasons for revising UKRs include disease progression (36.9%), loosening (31.7%), and pain (7.5%). Loosening typically occurs due to osteolysis caused by wear particles from the polyethylene (PE) inserts. There is limited published literature which has quantified volumetric material loss from the PE inserts of cemented fixed-bearing UKRs. This study aimed to quantify bearing wear and backside deformation of these PE components. At our national retrieval centre, we measured changes volumetric bearing wear and backside deformation of 31 explanted fixed-bearing Physica ZUK UKR PE inserts using a peer-reviewed methodology based on coordinate measuring machine analysis. These explants had been revised for any indication [Females (19) and Males (12)]. The location of the wear scars was identified and mapped. We compared the volumetric wear from the bearing surface with contemporary total knee replacement (TKR) inserts.Objectives
Design and Methods
Several studies have reported elevated blood cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) concentrations in patients with total knee replacements (TKRs). Up to 44% of tissue samples taken from patients with failed TKRs exhibit histological evidence of metal sensitivity/ALVAL. In simulated conditions, metal particles contribute approximately 12% of total wear debris in TKR. We carried out this investigation to determine the source and quantity of metal release in TKRs. We analysed 225 explanted fixed-bearing TKRs (Attune, Genesis II, NexGen, PFC, and Vanguard) revised for any indication. These were analysed using peer-reviewed [coordinate measuring machine (CMM)] methodology to measure the volumetric wear of the polyethylene (PE) bearing surfaces and trays. The trays were analysed using 2D profilometry (surface roughness-Ra) and light microscopy. Histological and blood metal ion concentration analyses were performed in a sub-sample of patients.Objectives
Design and Methods
We identified an unusual pattern of backside deformation on polyethylene (PE) inserts of contemporary total knee replacements (TKRs). The PE backside's margins were inferiorly deformed in TKRs with NexGen central-locking trays. This backside deformation was significantly associated with tray debonding. Furthermore, recent studies have shown high rate of tray debonding in PS NexGen TKRs. Subsequently, a field safety notice was issued regarding the performance of this particular device combination and the Option tray has been withdrawn from use. Therefore, we hypothesised that the backside deformation of PS inserts may be greater than that of CR inserts. At our national implant retrieval centre, we used peer-reviewed techniques to analyse changes in the bearing wear rate and backside surface deformation of NexGen PE inserts using coordinate measuring machines [N=84 (CR-43 and PS-41) TKRs with non-augmented-trays]. Multiple regression was used to determine which variable had the greatest influence on backside deformation. The amount of cement cover on trays was quantified as a %of the total surface using Image-J software.Objectives
Design and Methods
At our national explant retrieval unit, we identified an unusual pattern of backside-deformation on polyethylene (PE) inserts of contemporary total-knee-replacements (TKRs). The PE backside's margins were inferiorly deformed in TKRs with central-locking trays. We reported that this backside-deformation appeared to be linked to tray debonding. Moreover, recent studies have shown high-rate of tray debonding in PS NexGen TKRs. Therefore, we hypothesised that backside deformation on PS inserts may be more than on CR inserts. We used peer-reviewed techniques to analyse changes in the bearing (wear rate) and backside surfaces (deformation) of PE inserts using coordinate measuring machines [N=61 NexGen (CR-39 and PS-22) TKRs with non-augmented-trays]. Multiple regression was used to determine which variable had the greatest influence on backside-deformation. The amount of cement cover on trays was quantified as a %of the total surface using Image-J software.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
