The peripheral neuronal phenotype is significantly altered in rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) with a clear upregulation of the Glutaminergic system being present in disease. Shoulder pain is the third most frequent cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain in the community and is usually caused by rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT). The central and peripheral nervous system play an important role in both tissue homoeostasis and tendon healing. The Glutaminergic system is of key importance in driving the peripheral and central neuronal changes which increase the body's sensitivity to pain (1, 2). No study to date has investigated the role of the glutaminergic system in human RCT. We hypothesised that the peripheral neuronal phenotype would be altered in RCT, and would vary according to disease stage as measured by size of tear. The term ‘peripheral neuronal phenotype’ is used to refer to refer to specific characteristics of the peripheral nervous system, neuronal mediators and the receptors for these mediators in peripheral tissueSummary Statement
Introduction
The aim of this study was to investigate genetic influences on the development and progression of tears of the rotator cuff. From a group of siblings of patients with a tear of the rotator cuff and of controls studied five years earlier, we determined the prevalence of tears of the rotator cuff with and without associated symptoms using ultrasound and the Oxford Shoulder Score. In the five years since the previous assessment, three of 62 (4.8%) of the sibling group and one of the 68 (1.5%) controls had undergone shoulder surgery. These subjects were excluded from the follow-up. Full-thickness tears were found in 39 of 62 (62.9%) siblings and in 15 of 68 (22.1%) controls (p = 0.0001). The relative risk of full-thickness tears in siblings as opposed to controls was 2.85 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75 to 4.64), compared to 2.42 (95% CI 1.77 to 3.31) five years earlier. Full-thickness tears associated with pain were found in 30 of 39 (76.9%) tears in the siblings and in eight of 15 (53.3%) tears in the controls (p = 0.045). The relative risk of pain associated with a full-thickness tear in the siblings as opposed to the controls was 1.44 (95% CI 2.04 to 8.28) (p = 0.045). In the siblings group ten of 62 (16.1%) had progressed in terms of tear size or development compared to one of 68 (1.5%) in the control group which had increased in size. Full-thickness rotator cuff tears in siblings are significantly more likely to progress over a period of five years than in a control population. This implies that genetic factors have a role, not only in the development but also in the progression of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff.
