To identify the responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference (MCID), minimal clinical important change (MIC), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds in the 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) (v2) for each of the eight dimensions and the total score following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There were 3,321 patients undergoing primary TKA with preoperative and one-year postoperative SF-36 scores. At one-year patients were asked how satisfied they were and “How much did the knee arthroplasty surgery improve the quality of your life?”, which was graded as: great, moderate, little (n = 277), none (n = 98), or worse.Aims
Methods
The primary aim of this study was to assess the rate of patient
satisfaction one year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) according
to the focus of the question asked. The secondary aims were to identify
independent predictors of patient satisfaction according to the
focus of the question. A retrospective cohort of 2521 patients undergoing a primary
unilateral TKA were identified from an established regional arthroplasty
database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, Western Ontario and
McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and 12-Item Short-Form
Health Survey (SF-12) scores were collected preoperatively and one
year postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed using four
questions, which focused on overall outcome, activity, work, and
pain. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent
preoperative predictors of increased stiffness when adjusting for
confounding variables.Aims
Patients and Methods
The primary aim of this study was to assess whether patient satisfaction
one year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) changed with longer
follow-up. The secondary aims were to identify predictors of satisfaction
at one year, persistence of patient dissatisfaction, and late onset
dissatisfaction in patients that were originally satisfied at one year. A retrospective cohort consisting of 1369 patients undergoing
a primary TKA for osteoarthritis that had not undergone revision
were identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient
demographics, comorbidities, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, and Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire
scores were collected preoperatively, and one and five years postoperatively.
In addition, patient satisfaction was assessed at one and five years
postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify
independent predictors of satisfaction at one and five years.Aims
Patients and Methods
We wished to quantify the influence of constraint and various principal indications upon functional outcome following aseptic first time revision knee arthroplasty. In this single centre, prospective study we have looked into the outcome of 175 total revision knee replacement performed between 2003 and 2008 at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Data was refined to allow for examination exclusively of those cases where the level of constraint was increased from cruciate retaining or cruciate sacrificing knee replacement to either non linked constrained implant (condylar constrained) or linked constrained (rotating hinge) prosthesis.Introduction
Methods
