Fractures of the Proximal Femur are a common and disabling injury requiring hospital admission and surgical treatment leading to approximately 86,000 inpatient episodes annually in the UK, with such patients occupying more than 20% of NHS orthopaedic beds. Based on current trends the number of hip fractures may rise to 120,000 per annum by 2015.

As the age of the population increases, so does the prevalence of concomitant medical conditions. Atrial Fibrillation is rising in the general population. Recently, the benefit of treating these patients with warfarin to prevent stroke has been shown; as a consequence, the number of patients being treated with warfarin is on the increase.

We have performed a retrospective study of all patients admitted to our unit with Fractures of the neck of the femur between 2001 and 2006, from the Accident and Emergency department with a primary diagnosis of Proximal Femoral Fracture (1987 patients). 138 patients were on long term warfarin at the time of their admission (6.9% of admissions). 90.4% were being warfarinised for AF, 7.6% for DVT and the rest for other indications. Of these Patients only 12 (8.7%) received active reversal to their warfarin. (All received vitamin K either orally or Intravenously). The average delay to theatre attributable to warfarin therapy was 41.1 hours (p-0.001). Active reversal allowed this delay to be negated (p-0.01), and did not delay the reloading of warfarin post-operatively (p-0.012). It also allowed an average of 10.2 days earlier discharge from the orthopaedic unit (p-0.001).

This study shows that significant delays occur because of Warfarinisation of these patients and that active reversal seems to be beneficial in expediting surgical treatment and discharge from the orthopaedic unit.

Given that there is limited time available to the surgeon in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, how is the time best spent? Should they place one Modified Mason-Allen, two mattress or four simple sutures? This study reverses current thought. In an in-vitro biomechanical single pull to failure study we compared the ultimate tensile strength of simple, mattress and grasping sutures passed with an arthroscopic suture passer (Surgical Solutions Express-Sew). The aim was to determine which suture configurations would most simply, repeatably and reliably repair the rotator cuff.

The ultimate tensile strength and mode of failure of six different suture configurations was repeatedly tested on a validated porcine rotator cuff tendon model, using a standard suture material (Number 2 Fiberwire) passed with the Surgical Solutions Express-sew, in a Hounsfield type H20K-W digital tensometer.

Standardising the number of suture passes to four, the strongest construct was two mattress sutures (Mean 169N), followed by single Modified Kessler (Mean 161N), four simple sutures (Mean 155N) and finally a single Mason Allen suture (Mean 140N). Suture configurations involving two passes were all weaker than those with four (one way analysis of variance p=0.026), even when Number 2 Fibertape was used to augment strength.

These results show little difference in strength for varying complexity of four pass suture passage (one way analysis of variance p=0.61). In simple terms there is no demonstrable difference in the strength of construct whether the surgeon uses four simple, two mattress or one grasping suture. This study allows the surgeon to justify using the simplest configuration of suture passage that works in his hands in order to obtain a reliable and repeatable repair of the rotator cuff arthroscopically.