Purpose: In a prospective randomized clinical trial, we have previously reported the “limb-specific” results comparing operative (plate fixation) versus non-operative (sling) treatment for completely displaced fractures of the shaft of the clavicle. We also sought to determine the effect that a fracture of the shaft of the clavicle had on general health status, as measured by the SF-36 General Health Status instrument. We then evaluated the effects of different treatment methods (operative versus non-operative), on general health scores.

Method: We performed a multi-center, randomized clinical trial of operative versus non-operative treatment of completely displaced clavicular shaft fractures in 111 patients. In addition to radiographic, surgeon-based, and limb-specific data we prospectively gathered SF-36 questionnaires at baseline, and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-injury.

Results: Results: Both groups had SF-36 scores equivalent to or slightly superior to population norms at baseline. A clavicular shaft fracture had a significant negative effect on SF-36 scores (especially the physical components) in both groups at 6 weeks (p< 0.01) and 3 months (p< 0.01). There was a statistically greater decrease in Physical Component Scores (PCS) in the non-operative group compared to the operative group (P< 0.05). At 6 months, scores had returned to pre-operative levels in the operative group, but remained significantly decreased in the non-operative group (p=0.04). This difference persisted at the one and two year points.

Conclusion: A displaced fracture of the clavicular shaft has a clinically significant negative effect on general health status scores. This effect can be mitigated by primary operative fixation, which restores scores to normal levels by six months post-injury. Patients treated non-operatively for a displaced fracture of the shaft of the clavicle demonstrated lower PCS scores at two years post-injury. This information is useful in counseling patients with regards to treatment options following displaced fractures of the clavicle shaft.

Purpose: In a prospective randomized clinical trial, we have previously reported the “limb-specific” results comparing operative (plate fixation) versus non-operative (sling) treatment for completely displaced fractures of the shaft of the clavicle. We also sought to determine the effect that a fracture of the shaft of the clavicle had on general health status, as measured by the SF-36 General Health Status instrument. We then evaluated the effects of different treatment methods (operative versus non-operative), on general health scores.

Materials: We performed a multi-center, randomized clinical trial of operative versus non-operative treatment of completely displaced clavicular shaft fractures in 111 patients. In addition to radiographic, surgeon-based, and limb-specific data we prospectively gathered SF-36 questionnaires at baseline, and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-injury.

Results: Both groups had SF-36 scores equivalent to or slightly superior to population norms at baseline. A clavicular shaft fracture had a significant negative effect on SF-36 scores (especially the physical components) in both groups at 6 weeks (p< 0.01) and 3 months (p> < 0.01). There was a statistically greater decrease in Physical Component Scores (PCS) in the non-operative group compared to the operative group (P> < 0.05). At 6 months, scores had returned to pre-operative levels in the operative group, but remained significantly decreased in the non-operative group (p=0.04). This difference persisted at the one and two year points.

Conclusions: A displaced fracture of the clavicular shaft has a clinically significant negative effect on general health status scores. This effect can be mitigated by primary operative fixation, which restores scores to normal levels by six months post-injury. Patients treated non-operatively for a displaced fracture of the shaft of the clavicle demonstrated lower PCS scores at two years post-injury.

We conducted a prospective randomised controlled trial to compare functional outcomes, complications and reoperation rates in elderly patients with displaced intra-articular distal humerus fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or primary semi-constrained total elbow arthroplasty (TEA).

Twenty-one patients were randomised to each treatment group. Two patients died prior to follow-up and were excluded from the study. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were collected at six weeks, three months, six months, twelve months and two years. Complication type, duration, management, and treatment requiring reoperation were recorded.

Five patients randomised to ORIF were converted to TEA intraoperatively because of extensive comminution and inability to obtain fixation stable enough to allow early ROM. This resulted in fifteen patients (three male, twelve female) with an average age of seventy-seven years in the ORIF group and twenty-five patients (two male, twenty-three female) with an average age of seventy-eight in the TEA group. MEPS was significantly improved at three months (82 vs 65, p=0.01), six months (86 vs 66, p=0.003), twelve months (87 vs 72, p=0.03) and two years (86 vs 73, p=0.04) in patients with TEA compared with ORIF. DASH scores showed a significant improvement for TEA compared with ORIF between six weeks (43 vs 77, p=0.02) and six months (31 vs 50, p=0.01) but not at twelve months (32 vs 47, p=0.1) and two years (34 vs 38, p=0.6). Reoperation rates for TEA (3/25) and ORIF (4/15) were not statistically different (p=0.2).

TEA for the treatment of comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures provides improved functional outcome compared with ORIF.

Bone transport/limb lengthening with circular external fixation has been associated with a prolonged period of time in the frame and a significant major complication rate following frame removal. We examined the results of bone transport in fifty-one limbs using the “monorail” technique and found a dramatically improved lengthening index (24.5 days/cm. – time in frame /cm. of length gained) and an absence of refracture or angulatory deformity following fixator removal. This technique is our treatment of choice for limb lengthening/bone transport.

We sought to determine patient oriented outcome and complication rates following b one transport using an external fixator placed over an intramedullary nail (the “monorail” technique).

Bone transport using the monorail technique is associated with a dramatically improved lengthening index and a lower major complication rate than traditional ring fixator methods. Patient satisfaction with the procedure was high.

Our study confirms the significant advantages of the monorail technique for bone transport/limb lengthening. The time in the fixator is dramatically reduced, and complications associated with earlier techniques such as angulatory deformity or refracture were not seen.

We identified forty-nine patients (fifty-one limbs) who had undergone bone transport using the monorail technique (external fixator placed over an intramedullary nail). There were thirty-five men and fourteen women with a mean age of thirty-five years (range 17–50). Pre-operative diagnoses included post traumatic length discrepancy/bone defect (forty-one), congenital short stature (six) and other (four). All patients had a unilateral fixator placed over an implanted intramedullary nail. Once length correction was achieved, the fixator was removed and the nail “locked”. The mean amount of lengthening was 5.5 cm. (range 2 – 18 cm.). The lengthening index was 24.5 days /cm. (duration of external fixation/cm. bone length gained), with a range from ten to fifty days /cm. There were nineteen complications (thirty-seven percent): nine premature consolidations, four infected pin sites, two hardware failures, two osteomyelitis, one DVT, one nonunion. There were no refractures, angulatory deformities or cases of intramedullary sepsis.

When deciding on treatment for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures, patients often inquire if repair of (potential) nonunion results in outcome similar to acute fixation. We used objective muscle strength testing and patient-oriented outcome measures to examine this question. Late reconstruction of nonunion following displaced mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle results in restoration of objective muscle strength similar to that seen with immediate fixation. However, there was a significant loss in muscle endurance as well as a trend towards a decrease in outcome scores (DASH, Constant) following late reconstruction. This information is useful in surgical decision making and in counseling patients.

Using objectively measured strength and patient-oriented health-status instruments, we sought to determine if delay in repair of displaced, mid-shaft clavicle fractures negatively affected shoulder strength or outcome.

Late reconstruction of clavicle nonunion results in restoration of objective muscle strength similar to that seen with immediate fracture fixation, but there was a significant loss in muscle endurance as well as a trend towards a decrease in outcome scores (DASH, Constant).

All patients had sustained completely displaced, closed, isolated mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Fifteen patients had immediate plate fixation (mean 0.6 months post-fracture) and fifteen had plate fixation for non-union (mean fifty-eight months post-fracture). Objective muscle strength testing on the BTE was done a mean of twenty-nine months post-fixation (normal contralateral limb as control). There were no significant differences between acute fixation and delayed reconstruction groups with regards to strength of shoulder flexion (acute = 92.4%, delayed = 89.4%, p=0.56), shoulder abduction (acute = 98.8%, delayed = 96.7, p=0.75), external rotation (acute = 98.4%, delayed = 91.9%, p=0.29), or internal rotation (acute = 96.3%, delayed = 97.4%, p=0.87). However, there was a trend for improved Constant scores (acute = 94.5, delayed = 90, p=0.09) and the DASH scores (acute = 3.4, delayed = 9.0, p=0.09) in the acute fixation group. We found a significant decrease in muscle endurance with regards to shoulder flexion (acute = 107.0%, delayed = 71.1%, p=0.007) and a trend towards weaker shoulder abduction (acute = 103.1%, delayed = 88.7 %).

Funding: Mr. Potter was supported by a St. Michael’s Hospital Summer Student Scholarship