Circumferential periosteal release is a rarely reported procedure for paediatric limb lengthening. The technique involves circumferential excision of a strip of periosteum from the metaphysis of the distal femur, tibia and fibula. This study aims to determine the mid to long-term effectiveness of this technique. A retrospective case series was performed of all patients undergoing circumferential periosteal release of the distal femur and/or tibia between 2006 and 2017. Data collected included demographics, surgical indication, post-operative limb-lengths and complications. Data collection was stopped if a further procedure was performed that may affect limb-length (except a further release). Leg-length discrepancies were calculated as absolute values and as percentages of the longer limb-length. Final absolute and percentage discrepancies were compared to initial discrepancies using a paired t-test.Introduction
Materials and Methods
The aim of this study was to review the early
outcome of the Femoro-Patella Vialla (FPV) joint replacement. A
total of 48 consecutive FPVs were implanted between December 2007
and June 2011. Case-note analysis was performed to evaluate the
indications, operative histology, operative findings, post-operative
complications and reasons for revision. The mean age of the patients
was 63.3 years (48.2 to 81.0) and the mean follow-up was
25.0 months (6.1 to 48.9). Revision was performed in seven (14.6%)
at a mean of 21.7 months, and there was one re-revision. Persistent
pain was observed in three further patients who remain unrevised.
The reasons for revision were pain due to progressive tibiofemoral
disease in five, inflammatory arthritis in one, and patellar fracture following
trauma in one. No failures were related to the implant or the technique.
Trochlear dysplasia was associated with a significantly lower rate
of revision (5.9% Focal patellofemoral osteoarthritis secondary to trochlear dysplasia
should be considered the best indication for patellofemoral replacement.
Standardised radiological imaging, with MRI to exclude overt tibiofemoral
disease should be part of the pre-operative assessment, especially
for the non-dysplastic knee. Cite this article:
The Oxford knee score (OKS) is a validated and
widely accepted disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure,
but there is limited evidence regarding any long-term trends in
the score. We reviewed 5600 individual OKS questionnaires (1547
patients) from a prospectively-collected knee replacement database,
to determine the trends in OKS over a ten-year period following
total knee replacement. The mean OKS pre-operatively was 19.5 (95%
confidence interval (CI) 18.8 to 20.2). The maximum post-operative
OKS was observed at two years (mean score 34.4 (95% CI 33.7 to 35.2)),
following which a gradual but significant decline was observed through
to the ten-year assessment (mean score 30.1 (95% CI 29.1 to 31.1))
(p <
0.001). A similar trend was observed for most of the individual
OKS components (p <
0.001). Kneeling ability initially improved
in the first year but was then followed by rapid deterioration (p
<
0.001). Pain severity exhibited the greatest improvement, although
residual pain was reported in over two-thirds of patients post-operatively,
and peak improvement in the night pain component did not occur until
year four. Post-operative OKS was lower for women (p <
0.001),
those aged <
60 years (p <
0.003) and those with a body mass
index >
35 kg/m2 (p <
0.014), although similar changes
in scores were observed. This information may assist surgeons in
advising patients of their expected outcomes, as well as providing
a comparative benchmark for evaluating longer-term outcomes following
knee replacement. Cite this article:
We present a comparison of patient-reported outcomes
(PROMs) in relation to patient age, in patients who had received
a total (TKR) or unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The outcome
was evaluated using the Oxford knee score (OKS), EuroQol (EQ-5D)
and satisfaction scores. Patients aged 65 to 84 years demonstrated
better pre-operative function scores than those aged <
65 years
(OKS, p = 0.03; EQ-5D, p = 0.048) and those aged
≥ 85 years (OKS, p = 0.03). Post-operative scores were comparable
across age groups, but a linear trend for greater post-operative
improvement in OKS and EQ-5D was seen with decreasing age (p <
0.033). The overall mean satisfaction score at six months was 84.9,
but those aged <
55 years exhibited a lower mean level of satisfaction (78.3)
compared with all other age groups (all p <
0.031). The cumulative
overall two-year revision rate was 1.3%. This study demonstrates
that good early outcomes, as measured by the OKS and EQ-5D, can
be anticipated following knee replacement regardless of the patient’s
age, although younger patients gain greater improvement. However,
the lower satisfaction in those aged
<
55 years is a concern, and suggests that outcome is not fully
encapsulated by the OKS and EQ-5D evaluation, and raises the question
whether the OKS alone is an appropriate measure of pain and function
in younger, more active individuals. Cite this article: