The mobile-bearing variant of a single-radius design is assumed to provide more freedom of motion compared to the fixed-bearing variant because the insert does not restrict the natural movements of the femoral component. This would reduce the contact stresses and wear which in turn may have a positive effect on the fixation of the prosthesis to the bone and thereby decreases the risk for loosening. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate early migration of the tibial component and kinematics of a mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis of the same single-radius design.

According to a prospective randomized protocol 20 Triathlon single-radius posterior- stabilized knee prostheses were implanted (9 mobile-bearing and 11 fixed-bearing). Fluoroscopy and roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis were performed 6 and 12 months post-operatively.

The 1 year post-operative roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis results showed considerable early migrations in 3 mobile-bearing patients and 1 fixed-bearing patient. The range of knee flexion was the same for the mobile-bearing and fixed- bearing group. The mobile insert was following the femoral component during motion.

This study showed no apparent distinction in early migration and kinematics between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing single-radius total knee prostheses. Des- pite the mobile insert was following the femoral component during motion, and therefore performed as intended, no kinematic advantages of the mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis were seen. It is concluded that a mobile insert in single-radius total knee prostheses is redundant and will not lead to additional benefits.

Purpose of the study: Congruence between the femoral component and the insert has been proposed to decrease wear in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This congruence should favour unidirectional movement between the components because multidirectional movements carry a risk factor for wear up to 30-fold higher than unidirectional movements. This study explored in vivo displacements between the insert and the femoral component of a prosthesis in order to determine whether they meet the required kinematic criteria.

Material and methods: Twelve patients (7 women, 5 men) aged 45 to 79 years with BMI from 23 to 35 underwent knee surgery for osteoarthritis and were included in this study. The prosthesis was a mobile plateau pros-thesis implanted by the same surgeon using a navigation system. During the procedure, four tantalum beads were implanted in the polyethylene under stereotaxic guidance. The postoperative evaluation was performed at six months with the clinical evaluation (KSS, WOMAC) a 3D fluoroscopic protocol (walking, stairs, get up and go) and a radiostereometric analysis (RSA).

Results: Active flexion under weight bearing was 118 (range 102–125) and the mean KSS 165. The videofluoroscopy combined with RSA showed congruent axial rotation between the femoral component and the insert in the flexion arc 0/60 with a mean difference of 0.38 per degree of flexion (SD 1.85). Beyond 60° flexion, the posterior displacement of the condyle was greater than the insert rotation.

Discussion: Compared with other 3D videofluoroscopic studies, this analysis adds greater accuracy due to the implantation of tantalum beads in the insert, enabling a study of insert displacement in relation to the metal components. This method demonstrates that for the implant studied here, rotation of the insert follows the displacement of the femoral component exactly from 0 to 60° flexion, this is a gliding displacement. Then beyond 60°, a gliding plus rolling movement occurs displacing the femoral component posteriorly.

Conclusion: This in vivo study in patients with a mobile plateau knee prosthesis demonstrates that the insert has a rotation exactly like the femoral component and that complete congruency is maintained between the femoral component and the insert with a pure gliding contact from 0 to 60° flexion. The prerequisite criteria for this type of prosthesis designed to reduce the wear factor are thus confirmed.