To quantify bone-nail fit in response to varying nail placements by entry point translation in straight antegrade humeral nailing using three-dimensional (3D) computational analysis CT scans of ten cadaveric humeri were processed in 3D Slicer to obtain 3D models of the cortical and cancellous bone. The bone was divided into individual slices each consisting of 2% humeral length (L) with the centroid of each slice determined. To represent straight antegrade humeral nail, a rod consisting of two cylinders with diameters of 9.5mm and 8.5mm and length of 0.22L mm and 0.44L mm respectively joined at one end was modelled. The humeral head apex (surgical entry point) was translated by 1mm in both anterior-posterior and medio-lateral directions to generate eight entry points. Total nail protrusion surface area, maximum nail protrusion distance into cortical shell and top, middle, bottom deviation between nail and intramedullary cavity centre were investigated. Statistical analysis between the apex and translated entry points was conducted using paired t-test. A posterior-lateral translation was considered as the optimal entry point with minimum protrusion in comparison to the anterior-medial translation experiencing twice the level of protrusion. Statistically significant differences in cortical protrusion were found in anterior-medial and posterior-lateral directions producing increased and decreased level of protrusion respectively compared to the apex. The bottom anterior-posterior deviation distance appeared to be a key predictor of cortical breach with the distal nail being more susceptible. Furthermore, nails with anterior translation generated higher anterior-posterior deviation (>4mm) compared to posterior translation (<3mm). Aside from slight posterolateral translation of the entry point from the apex, inclusion of a distal posterior-lateral bend into current straight nail design could improve nail fitting within the curved humeral bone, potentially improving distal working length within the flat and narrow medullary canal of the distal humeral shaft.
To analyse bone stresses in humerus-megaprosthesis construct in response to axial loading under varying implant lengths in proximal humeral replacement following tumour excision. CT scans of 10 cadaveric humeri were processed in 3D Slicer to obtain three-dimensional (3D) models of the cortical and cancellous bone. Megaprostheses of varying body lengths (L) were modelled in FreeCAD to obtain the 3D geometry. Four FE models: group A consisting of intact bone; groups B (L=40mm), C (L=100mm) and D (L=120mm) comprising of humerus-megaprosthesis constructs were created. Isotropic linear elastic behaviour was assigned for all materials. A tensile load of 200N was applied to the elbow joint surface with the glenohumeral joint fixed with fully bonded contact interfaces. Static analysis was performed in Abaqus. The bone was divided at every 5% bone length beginning distally. Statistical analysis was performed on maximum von Mises stresses in cortical and cancellous bone across each slice using one-way ANOVA (0-45% bone length) and paired t-tests (45-70% bone length). To quantify extent of stress shielding, average percentage change in stress from intact bone was also computed. Maximum stress was seen to occur distally and anteriorly above the coronoid fossa. Results indicated statistically significant differences between intact state and shorter megaprostheses relative to longer megaprostheses and proximally between intact and implanted bones. Varying levels of stress shielding were recorded across multiple slices for all megaprosthesis lengths. The degree of stress shielding increased with implant lengthening being 2-4 times in C and D compared to B. Axial loading of the humerus can occur with direct loading on outstretched upper limbs or indirectly through the elbow. Resultant stress shielding effect predicted in longer megaprosthesis models may become clinically relevant in repetitive axial loading during activities of daily living. It is recommended to use shorter megaprosthesis to prevent failure.
