Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 190 - 190
1 Mar 2008
Wirtz D Mumme T Schuh A Gohlke F Carl H Zeiler G Forst R
Full Access

Background: The aim of this prospective multi-center study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a total of 314 uncemented femoral stem revisions using the modular MRP-titanium system.

Methods: 305 patients (111 males, 194 females, mean age 67.7) with 314 MRP-titanium systems were followed-up for a meantime of 3.2 years (1 to 9 years). Pre- and post-operatively all patients were clinically documented using the Harris hip score. Radiologically, the preoperative bony defects were assessed by the Paprosky classification. Post-operatively, periprosthetic bone remodeling was evaluated on the basis of radiographic evidence of bone apposition or resorption.

The modular MRP-titanium system has proven to be valuable in quite problematic cases of hip revision arthroplasty with extensive femoral defects. The system allows intraoperative adaptation of implant length and antetorsion angle to the actual situation, a feature not provided by non-modular femoral revision implants.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 229 - 229
1 Mar 2004
Wirtz D Schuh A Rader C Gohlke F Carl H Zeiler G Forst R
Full Access

Aims: Prospective multi-center study to evaluate the mid-term results of 280 uncemented femoral stem revisions using the modular MRP-Titan system. Methods: 273 patients with 280 MRP-Titan systems, follow-up for a mean time of 3 years (1 to 8 years). Harris hip score for clinical evaluation, bony defect classification according to Paprosky [163 cases (58%) with type 2B, 2C and 3]. Results: Three aseptic loosenings (1%), three septic loosenings (1%), one additional re-revision because of periprosthetic fracture. Postoperative dislocations occurred in 23 cases (8%), 17 of these (6%) were managed by closed or open reposition without changing the implant. In 6 cases (2%) the antetorsion angle of the modular prosthesis neck was altered. Harris hip score: 38 points preoperatively, 85 points at the last follow-up postoperatively. In 18 cases (6.4%) radiolucient lines were seen, but with no progression and no migration of the stems. The overall survival-rate after 8 years of follow-up was 92%. Conclusions: The modular MRP-Titan system has proven to be valuable in quite problematic cases of hip revision arthroplasty with extensive femoral defects. The system allows intraoperative adaptation of implant length and antetorsion angle to the actual situation, a feature not provided by non-modular femoral revision implants.