MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been reported as key regulators of bone formation, signalling, and repair. Fracture healing is a proliferative physiological process where the body facilitates the repair of a bone fracture. The aim of our study was to explore the effects of microRNA-186 (miR-186) on fracture healing through the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling pathway by binding to Smad family member 6 (SMAD6) in a mouse model of femoral fracture. Microarray analysis was adopted to identify the regulatory miR of SMAD6. 3D micro-CT was performed to assess the bone volume (BV), bone volume fraction (BVF, BV/TV), and bone mineral density (BMD), followed by a biomechanical test for maximum load, maximum radial degrees, elastic radial degrees, and rigidity of the femur. The positive expression of SMAD6 in fracture tissues was measured. Moreover, the miR-186 level, messenger RNA (mRNA) level, and protein levels of SMAD6, BMP-2, and BMP-7 were examined.Objectives
Methods
Good clinical outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) demand the ability to plan a surgery precisely and measure the outcome accurately. In comparison with plain radiograph, CT-based 3D planning offers several advantages. More specifically, CT has the benefits of avoiding errors resulting from magnification and inaccurate patient positioning. Additional benefits include the assessment in the axial plane and the replacement of 2D projections with 3D data. The concern on 3D CT-based planning, however, lies in the increase of radiation dosage to the patients. An alternative is to reconstruct a patient-specific 3D model of the complete lower extremity from 2D X-ray radiographs. This study presents a clinical validation of a novel technology called “3XPlan” which allows for 3D prosthesis planning using 2D X-ray radiographs. After a local institution review board (IRB) approval, 3XPlan was evaluated on 24 patients TKA. Pre-operatively, all the patients underwent a CT scan according to a standard protocol. Image acquisition consisted of three separate short spiral axial scans: 1) ipsilateral hip, 2) affected knee and 3) ipsilateral ankle. All the CT images were segmented to extract 3D surface models of both femur and tibia, which were regarded as the ground truth. Additionally, 2 X-ray images were acquired for each affected leg and were used in 3XPlan to derive patient-specific models of the leg. For 3D models derived from both modalities (CT vs. X-ray), five most relevant anatomical parameters for planning TKA were measured and compared with each other. Except for tibial torsion, the average differences for all other anatomical parameters are smaller than or close to 3 degrees.
To validate a small, easy to use and cost-effective augmented marker-based hybrid navigation system for peri-acetabular osteotomy [PAO] surgery. A cadaver study including 3 pelvises (6 hip joints) undergoing navigated PAO was performed. Inclination and anteversion of two navigation systems for PAO were compared during acetabular reorientation. The hybrid system consists of a tracking unit which is placed on the patient's pelvis and an augmented marker which is attached to the patient's acetabular fragment. The tracking unit sends a video stream of the augmented marker to the host computer. Simultaneously, the augmented marker sends orientation output from an integrated inertial measurement unit (IMU) to the host computer. The host computer then computes the pose of the augmented marker and uses it (if visible) to compute acetabular orientation. If the marker is not visible, the output from the IMU is used to update the orientation. The second system served as ground truth and is a previously developed and validated optical tracking-based navigation system.Purpose
Methods
The limited field of view with less-invasive hip approaches for total hip arthroplasty can make a reliable cup positioning more challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cup placement between the traditional transgluteal approach and the anterior approach in a routine setting. We asked if the (1) accuracy, (2) precision, and (3) number of outliers of the prosthetic cup orientation differed between three study groups: the anterior approach in supine position, the anterior approach in lateral decubitus position, and the transgluteal approach in lateral decubitus position.Introduction
Objectives
Navigation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has the goal to improve accuracy of cup orientation. Measurement of cup orientation on conventional pelvic radiographs is susceptible to error due to pelvic malpositioning during acquisition. A recently developed and validated software using a postoperative radiograph in combination with statistical shape modelling allows calculation of exact 3-dimensional cup orientation independent of pelvic malpositioning. We asked (1) what is the accuracy of computer-navigated cup orientation (inclination and anteversion) and (2) what is the percentage of outliers (>10° difference to aimed inclination and anteversion) using postoperative measurement of 3-dimensional cup orientation.Introduction
Objectives
In clinical routine surgeons depend largely on 2D x-ray radiographs and their experience to plan and evaluate surgical interventions around the knee joint. Numerous studies have shown that pure 2D x-ray radiography based measurements are not accurate due to the error in determining accurate radiography magnification and the projection characteristics of 2D radiographs. Using 2D x-ray radiographs to plan 3D knee joint surgery may lead to component misalignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) or to over- or under-correction of the mechanical axis in Lower Extremity Osteotomy (LEO). Recently we developed a personalized X-ray reconstruction-based planning and post-operative treatment evaluation system called “iLeg” for TKA or LEO. Based on a patented X-ray image calibration cage and a unique 2D–3D reconstruction technique, iLeg can generate accurate patient-specific 3D models of a complete lower extremity from two standing X-rays for true 3D planning and evaluation of surgical interventions at the knee joint. The goal of this study is to validate the accuracy of this newly developed system using digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) generated from CT data of cadavers. CT data of 12 cadavers (24 legs) were used in the study. For each leg, two DRRs, one from the antero-posterior (AP) direction and the other from the later-medial (LM) direction, were generated following clinical requirements and used as the input to the iLeg software. The 2D–3D reconstruction was then done by non-rigidly matching statistical shape models (SSMs) of both femur and tibia to the DRRs (seee Fig. 1). In order to evaluate the 2D–3D reconstruction accuracy, we conducted a semi-automatic segmentation of all CT data using the commercial software Amira (FEI Corporate, Oregon, USA). The reconstructed surface models of each leg were then compared with the surface models segmented from the associated CT data. Since the DRRs were generated from the associated CT data, the surface models were reconstructed in the local coordinate system of the CT data. Thus, we can directly compare the reconstructed surface models with the surface models segmented from the associated CT data, which we took as the ground truth. Again, we used the software Amira to compute distances from each vertex on the reconstructed surface models to the associated ground truth models.Introduction
Methods
Recently we developed a personalised X-ray reconstruction-based planning and post-operative treatment evaluation system called iLeg for total knee arthroplasty or lower extremity osteotomy. Based on a patented X-ray image calibration cage and a unique 2D-3D reconstruction technique, iLeg can generate accurate patient-specific 3D models of a complete lower extremity from two standing X-rays for true 3D planning and evaluation of surgical interventions at the knee joint. The goal of this study is to validate the accuracy of this newly developed system using digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) generated from CT data of 12 cadavers (24 legs). Our experimental results demonstrated an overall reconstruction accuracy of 1.3±0.2mm.
Acetabular cup malpositioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is known to lead to impingement, instability, wear-induced osteolysis, and increased rates of revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to independently evaluate the accuracy of acetabular cup orientation using a novel mechanical navigation device. Postoperative acetabular cup orientation was reviewed in 47 primary THAs using the HipSextant mechanical navigation device. Angles were measured with a validated two-dimensional/three-dimensional matching application. An outlier was defined as +/− 10 degrees outside of the preoperative plan for inclination and anteversion.Background
Methods
Accurate reconstruction of the knee pose from two X-Ray images will allow the study pre-operative kinematics (for custom prosthesis design) and the post-operative evaluation of the intervention. We used a SSM of the distal femur, based on 24 MRI datasets, from which the mean model and its modes of variation were defined. On the SSM, N landmarks in predefined positions were defined. The user identifies the same landmarks on two X-ray projections. Back-projecting the X-ray from the identified landmarks pixel to the corresponding source, each landmark position in the 3D space is reconstructed and the mean model pose initialised with a corresponding points registration. The silhouette of the SSM is projected on each X-ray image, which is automatically segmented in order to define the bone contours. With a Robust Point Matching algorithm based on Thin Plate Splines the projected silhouette points are deformed to better approximate the contour. For each contour point, the associated silhouette point is computed. We back-projected the ray from each contour point to the source and find on each ray the point with minimum distance to the silhouette. The cost function is the squared sum of the distances for both images. After a first optimisation of the pose, we perform a shape optimisation to find the correct weights for the SSM. To evaluate our algorithm, we used two Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRR) created as projections at 90° from a CT dataset. The CT based model was reconstructed and the landmarks were defined on it with a rigid registration of the SSM. In order to validate the robustness of our reconstruction method, a random uniform noise distribution (0–50 mm on each direction) was added on each landmark. The reconstruction accuracy was measured as the distance between each reconstructed landmark and the ground truth defined on the CT. Results show that the population of the errors for the noise levels from 0 to 30 is similar: only the population with 50 mm noise is significantly different from the results obtained with other noise levels. We can conclude that with a noise level below 50 mm the algorithm is able to return the correct pose of the femur, while with higher noise the initial distribution of the landmarks in the 3D space prevents the correct outcome of the algorithm. The user should select the landmarks within a range of 50 mm on the 3D representation, that is half the dimension of the bounding box containing the model. We can assume that in the real case it will be more difficult to select the proper position of the landmarks, but our method proved to be robust even with misplaced landmarks.
Tracked B-mode ultrasound (US) potentially provides a non-invasive and radiation-free alternative to percutaneous pointer digitization for intra-operative determination of the anterior pelvis plane (APP). However, most of the published approaches demand a direct access to the corresponding landmarks, which can only be presumed for surgical approaches with the patient in supine position. In order to avoid any change of the clinical routine for total hip arthroplasties (THAs), we propose a new method to determine the pelvic orientation, which could be performed in lateral position. Our proposed method is based on the acquisition of ultrasound images of the ipsilateral hemi-pelvis, namely the posterior superior iliac spines (PSISs) and iliac crest region. The US images are tracked by a navigation system and further processed to extract three-dimensional point clouds. As only one side of the pelvis is accessible, we estimate the symmetry plane (midsagittal plane) of the pelvis based on additionally digitized bilateral anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) landmarks. This symmetry plane is further used to mirror the ipsilateral US-derived points to the contralateral side of the pelvis and to register and instantiate a pelvic SSM constructed from 30 CT-scans. The proposed registration method was evaluated using two plastic pelvis models and two cadaveric pelvises together with special custom-made silicone phantoms to simulate the missing soft-tissue. In each trial, the required data were collected with the pelvis rigidly fixed in lateral decubitus position together with ground truth APP landmarks. A registration error of 3.48° ± 1.10° was found for the anteversion angle, while the inclination angle could be reconstructed with a mean error of 1.26° ± 1.62°. The performed in-vitro experiments showed reasonably good results, taking the sparsity of the input point clouds into consideration.
The integration of statistical shape models (SSMs) for generating a patient-specific model from sparse data is widely spread. The SSM needs to be initially registered to the coordinate-system in which the data is acquired and then be instantiated based on the point data using some regressing techniques such as principal component analysis (PCR). Besides PCR, partial least squares regression (PLSR) could also be used to predict a patient-specific model. PLSR combines properties of PCR and multiple linear regression and could be used for shape prediction based on morphological parameters. Both methods were compared on the basis of two SSMs, each of them constructed from 30 surface models of the proximal femur and the pelvis, respectively. Thirty leave-one-out trials were performed, in which one surface was consecutively left out and further used as ground truth surface model. Landmark data were randomly derived from the surface models and used together with the remaining 29 surface models to predict the left-out surface model based on PCR and PLSR, respectively. The prediction accuracy was analysed by comparing the ground truth model with the corresponding predicted model and expressed in terms of mean surface distance error. According to their obtained minimum error, PCR (1.62 mm) and PLSR (1. 63 mm) gave similar results for a set of 50 randomly chosen landmarks. However PLSR seems to be more susceptible to a wrong selection of number of latent vectors, as it has a more variation in the error. Although both regression methods gave similar results, decision needs to be done, how to select the optimal number of regressors, which is a delicate task. In order to predict a surface model based on morphological parameters using PLSR, the choice of the parameters and their optimal number needs to be carefully selected.
The goal of this study was to validate accuracy and reproducibility of a new 2D/3D reconstruction-based program called “HipRecon” for determining cup orientation after THA. “HipRecon” uses a statistical shape model based 2D/3D deformable registration technique that can reconstruct a patient-specific 3D model from a single standard AP pelvic X-ray radiograph. Required inputs include a digital radiograph, the pixel size, and the film-to-source distance. No specific calibration of the X-ray, or a CAD (computer-assisted design) model of the implant, or a CT-scan of the patient is required. Cup orientation is then calculated with respect to the anterior pelvic plane that is derived from the reconstructed 3D-model. The validation study was conducted on datasets of 29 patients (31 hips). Among them, there were 15 males and 14 females. Each dataset has one post-operative X-ray radiograph and one post-operative CT-scan. The post-operative CT scan for each patient was used to establish the ground truth for the cup orientation. Radiographs with deep centering (7 radiographs), or of pelvises with fractures (2 radiographs), or with both (1 radiograph), or of non-hemispherely shaped cup (1 radiograph) were assessed separately from the radiographs without above mentioned phenomena (18 radiographs) to estimate a potential influence on the 2D/3D reconstruction accuracy. To make the description easier, we denote those radiographs with above mentioned phenomena as non-normal cases and those without as normal cases. The cup anteversions and inclinations that were calculated by “HipRecon” were compared to the associated ground truth. To validate the reproducibility and the reliability, one observer conducted twice measurements for each dataset using “HipRecon”. The mean accuracy for the normal cases was 0.4° ± 1.8° (−2.6° to 3.3°) for inclination and 0.6° ± 1.5° (−2.0° to 3.9°) for anteversion, and the mean accuracy for the non-normal cases was 2.3° ± 2.4° (−2.1° to 6.3°) for inclination and 0.1° ± 2.8° (−4.6° to 5.1°) for anteversion. Comparing the measurement from the normal radiographs to those from the non-normal radiographs using the Mann-Whitney U-test, we found a significant difference in measuring cup inclination (p = 0.01) but not in measuring cup anteversion (p = 0.3). Bland-Altman analysis of those measurements from the normal cases indicated that no systematical error was detected for “HipRecon,” as the mean of the measurement pairs were spread evenly and randomly for both inclination and anteversion. “HipRecon” showed a very good reproducibility for both parameters with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inclination of 0.98 (95% Confidence Limits (CL): 0.96–0.99) and for anteversion of 0.96 (95% CL: 0.91–0.98). Accurate assessment of the acetabular cup orientation is important for evaluation of outcome after THA, but the inability to measure acetabular cup orientation accurately limits one's ability to determine optimal cup orientations, to assess new treatment methods of improving acetabular cup orientation in surgery, and to correlate the acetabular cup orientation to osteolysis, wear, and instability. In this study, we showed that “HipRecon” was an accurate, consistent, and reproducible technique to measure cup orientation from post-operative X-ray radiographs. Furthermore, our experimental results indicated that the best results were achieved with the radiographs of non-fractured pelvises that included the anterior superior iliac spines and the cranial part of the non-fractured pelvis. Thus, it is recommended that these landmarks should be included in the radiograph whenever the 2D/3D reconstruction-based method will be used
The existing image-free Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) navigation systems conventionally utilise the patient-specific Anterior Pelvic Plane (APP) as the reference to calculate orientations of the implanted cup, e.g. anteversion and inclination angles. The definition of APP relies on the intra-operative digitisation of three anatomical landmarks, the bilateral Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS) and the pubicum. Due to the presence of the thick soft tissue around the patient's pubic region, however, the landmark on pubic area is hard to be digitised accurately. A novel reference plane called Intra-operative Reference Plane (IRP) was proposed by G. Zheng et al to address this issue. To determine the IRP, bilateral ASIS and the cup center of the operating side instead of the pubicum are digitised intra-operatively. It avoids the error-prone digitisation of pubicum, and the angle between the patient-specific APP and the suggested IRP can be computed pre-operatively by a single X-ray radiograph-based 2D/3D reconstruction approach developed by G. Zheng et al. Based on this angle, the orientation of the APP can be intra-operatively estimated from that of the IRP such that all measurements with respect to IRP can be transformed to measurements with respect to APP. In order to implement and validate this new reference plane for image-free navigation of acetabular cup placement, we developed an IRP-based image-free THA navigation system. All cup placement instruments were mounted with passive markers whose positions could be traced by a NDI Polaris® infrared camera (Northern Digital Inc, Ontario, Canada). The cup center was obtained by first pivoting a tracked impactor with appropriate size of the mounted trial cup and then calculating the pivoting center through a least-squares fitting. The bilateral ASIS landmarks were acquired through the percutaneous pointer-based digitisation. We tested this new IRP-based image-free THA navigation system in our laboratory by conducting twelve studies on two dry cadaver pelvises and two plastic pelvises. The ground truth for each study was established using the conventional APP-based method, i.e., in addition to those landmarks required by our IRP-based method, we also digitised the pubicum on respective pelvic bones and calculated cup orientations on the basis of the digitised APP. The mean and standard deviation of differences between the proposed IRP-based anteversion measurement and the ground truth are 1.0 degree and 0.7 degree, while the maximal and minimal differences are 2.1 degree and 0.3 degree respectively. The mean and standard deviation of differences between the proposed IRP-based inclination measurement and the ground truth are respective 0.2 degree and 0.2 degree. Moreover, the maximum of differences is 0.5 degree and the minimum is 0.0 degree. Our laboratory experimental results demonstrate that the new IRP-based image-free navigation system is accurate enough for acetabular cup placement. In comparison to existing image-free navigation systems that use APP as the reference plane, the newly developed system employs IRP as the reference plane, which has the advantage to eliminate the digitisation of landmarks around the pubic region. The successful validation with the laboratorial study has led us to the next step of clinical trials. We expect to report preliminary clinical cases in the near future.
The optimal goal for cup positioning in hip arthroplasty in individual patients is affected by many factors including surgical exposure, femoral anteversion, and pelvic tilt. Some navigation systems ignore pelvic tilt and are based strictly on the anterior pelvic plane while others incorporate pelvic tilt, as measured in the supine position on the operating table. Neither approach incorporates knowledge of preoperative spino-pelvic flexibility or predictions of the change in spino-pelvic attitude or flexibility following surgery. While prior studies have shown little change in pelvic tilt postoperatively, one recent study based on gait analysis, suggested that changes in pelvic tilt are not predictable. The current study aims to assess changes in pelvic tilt following surgery. 24 patients, 12 male and 12 female, underwent THA using CT-based navigation. Each patient had supine and standing AP pelvis radiographs both pre-operatively and at a minimum of 1 year post-operatively. Pelvic tilt on each radiograph was measured using a noncommercial two-dimensional/three-dimensional matching application. (HipMatch; Institut for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, Bern, Switzerland). This software application uses a fully auto- mated registration procedure that can match the three- dimensional model of the preoperative CT with the projected pelvis on a postoperative radiograph. This method has been validated and for measurement of cup position for example showed a mean accuracy of 1.7° +/− 1.7° (rang-4.6° to 5.5°) in the coronal plane and 0.9° +/− 2.8° (rang-5.2° to 5.7°) in the sagittal plane compared with postoperative CT measurements. The software showed a good consistency with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inclination of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93 to 0.98) and for anteversion of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91 to 0.98). A good reproducibility and reliability for both inclination and anteversion was found with an ICC ranging from 0.95 to 0.99. No systematic errors in accuracy were detected with the Bland- Altman analysis. Using the HipMatch 2D/3D application, changes in pelvic tilt before and after surgery were assess in both the supine and standing positions.Introduction
Methods
Retrospective review. To report the technique and results of vertebral column decancellation (VCD) for the management of sharp angular spinal deformity.Study Design
Objective
Acetabular component malpositioning increases the risk of impingement, dislocation, and wear. The goal of computer-assisted techniques is to improve the accuracy of component positioning, in particular optimizing the orientation of the acetabular cup. The goal of the current study was to measure accuracy of cup placement in a large clinical series of hips that underwent CT-based computer-assisted THA. 146 hips in 140 patients underwent CT-based computer-assisted THA between 2006 and 2008. In all cases cup orientation was planned according to the individual preoperative CT and the anterior pelvic plane with an inclination of 41° and anteversion of 30°. For the procedure, all patients were placed in the lateral position and the cup was implanted using angled instruments. Intra-operatively all cases were navigated using an optoelec-tronic camera and tracked instruments (Vector Vision prototype, BrainLab, Germany). Post-operatively, cup orientation was measured using a previously validated technique of 2D/3D-matching using the preoperative CT and post-operative radiographs. This technique allows for accurate measurement of cup position from plain radiographs corrected for individual pelvic orientation. The mean accuracy for inclination was −2.5° ± 4.0° (−12° – 10°) and for anteversion it was 0.7° ± 5.3° (−11° – 15°). In 2 hips (1.4%) a deviation of more then 10° in inclination and in 4 hips (2.7%) a deviation of more then 10° in anteversion were found. The current study demonstrates that the acetabular component can routinely be implanted with the assistance of CT-based navigation with reasonable agreement between the navigation measurements of component orientation at the time of surgery. Nonetheless, outliers still occasionally occur. These might be due to unrecognized loosening of the pelvic reference base, inaccurate registration or the use of the ipsilateral surface-based registration algorithms which rely heavily on points near the center of rotation of the hip.
The software is based on a spline-based multi-resolution 2D-3D image registration algorithm and a Markov random field theory based on similarity measurement. Based on a cone projection (imitating the path of the x-rays), the software is able to match the three-dimensional CT-based data set with the contours of the projected pelvis on the AP pelvic radiograph. This gives the possibility to correct the measured cup orientation (inclination and anteversion) by measuring it according to an anatomical defined coordinate system (anterior pelvic plane). The validation of the software consisted of accuracy, reproducibility and observer reliability measurements using cadaver and clinical data. For the cadaver validation 10 human pelves (20 hips) were used. From each pelvis 2 CT scans, one with and one without an inserted cup were acquired. The CT scan with the cup was used as the ground truth. With the cup inserted 4 AP pelvic radiographs with the pelvis in an unknown arbitrary position during acquisition were performed resulting in 80 measurements for accuracy. These measurements were performed by 2 observers at 2 different occasions resulting in a total of 320 measurements for reproducibility and observer reliability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for quantification of reproducibility and observer reliability and the Bland-Altman analysis was used to detect systemic errors. The clinical validation included 33 patients with a pre- and a postoperative CT and 49 patients with only a postoperative CT in addition to the postoperative radiographs. In the cases with only a postoperative CT, for the 2D-3D matching the postoperative CT after manual excision of the cup from the CT slice sticks was used. In all cases the postoperative CT was used as the ground truth. For each patient all the available postoperative radiographs were used resulting in 236 measurements of accuracy. In the cadaver validation the cup orientation ranged from 34° – 57° for the inclination and from 1° – 24° for the anteversion measured on the CT. The accuracy showed a mean difference for the inclination of 0.9° ± 1.6° (−3.2° – 4.0°) and of 1.2 ± 2.4° (−5.3° – 5.6°) for the anteversion. The ICC for the reproducibility ranged from 0.96 to 0.99 and for the interobserver reliability from 0.95 to 0.98. No relevant systematic error was detected. In the clinical validation the cup orientation measured on the postoperative CT ranged for the inclination from 22° – 57° and for the anteversion from 7° – 35°. In the clinical setup the accuracy showed a mean difference for inclination of 1.8° ± 1.6° (−4.0° – 5.3°) and of −1.1° ± 2.9° (−5.9° – 5.7°) for the anteversion. The 2D-3D matching technique showed a good accuracy and a very good reproducibility and observer reliability. This technique allows to measure the exact cup orientation out of an AP pelvic radiograph with the help of a preoperative CT and to correct the parameters for the individual pelvic position. Therefore this software is a powerful tool to measure accuracy of CT-based computer-assisted cup placement in a large clinical series.
An ample number of radiographic hip parameters on anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs vary significantly with individual pelvic tilt and rotation. We developed specific computer software Hip2Norm to perform 3D analysis of the individual hip joint morphology using 2D AP pelvic radiographs. Twenty-five parameters can be calculated for a neutral orientation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity of this method for tilt and rotation correction of the acetabular rim and associated radiographic parameters. The validation comprised three steps:
External and internal validation; and intra-/interobserver analysis. A series of x-rays of 30 cadaver pelves were available for step 1 and 2. External validation comprised the comparison of radiographical parameters of the cadaver hips when determined with Hip2Norm in comparison with CT-based measurements or actual radiographs in a neutral pelvic orientation. Internal validation evaluated the consistency of the parameters when each single pelvis was calculated back from different random orientations to the same neutral pelvic position. The intra-/interob-server analysis investigated the reliability/reproducibility of all parameters with the help of 100 randomised, blinded radiographs of a consecutive patient series.
All but two parameters (acetabular index, ACE angle) showed a good to very correlation with the CT-measurements. Internal validity was good to very good for all parameters. There was a good to very good reliability and reproducibility of all parameters except five parameters. The software could be shown to be an accurate, reliable and reproducible method for correction of AP pelvic radiographs. This computer-assisted method allows standardised evaluation of all relevant radiographic parameters for detection of anatomic morphologic differences. It will be used to study the influence of pelvic malorientation on the radiographic appearance of each individual parameter and the clinical significance of standardising pelvic parameters.
