Failure of the polyethylene glenoid component is the most common complication of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) and accounts for a majority of the unsatisfactory results after this procedure. Nowadays, most of the shoulder prostheses consist of metal on polyethylene bearing components. Repetitive contact between the metal ball and the polyethylene socket produces progressive abrasion of the implant if the moving part is made of polyethylene. Its debris may then lead to an active osteolysis and implant loosening. Failure of the glenoid component is often manifested clinically by pain, loss of function, and the presence of a clunking noise and leads to revision surgery. The use of ceramic balls aims at the reduction of this phenomenon. In many studies regarding knee and hip replacement it has been shown that the use of ceramic on polyethylene (CoP) is more beneficial in terms of polyethylene wear and failure, when compared to metal on polyethylene (MoP). Since a human shoulder is very different from a hip and a knee, it is not a self-centering, neither congruent joint. And its stability is provided by healthy muscles of the rotator cuff. We decided to compare CoP against MoP in semi- force controlled test setup. Where, for a given governing angular motion the translational motion was a function of contact (frictional) forces between the tested couple (humeral head and PE). This is to our knowledge the first study to address in direct comparison wear in TSA in semi force controlled test setup. Up today, there is no test standard for wear testing of TSA. A customised joint simulator was used to create worst-case scenario motion allowing for simulation of the muscles in two perpendicular axes: inferior – superior (I-S) and anterior – posterior (A-P). Were a governing angular motion (GAM) was the abduction – adduction (±30°) in I-S. A system of springs was created so that the I-S translation and the A-P rotation were a result of the GAM. The stiffens of the springs was tuned based on the MoP pair initial kinematic (1000 cycles) to result in: about 2mm I-S translation, and about ±10° A-P rotation. All samples were tested at the same test station in order to obtain maximal repeatability. Axial load was in range of 100N to 750 N. Three articulating couples for each material were tested for total of 2M cycles. Standard midterm gravimetric measurements were conducted at each 0.5 M cycles.Introduction
Materials and methods
Despite proven advantages, pulsatile lavage seems to be used infrequently during preparation in cemented total knee arthroplasty. This remains irritating, as the technique has been suggested to improve radiological survival in cemented TKA, where aseptic loosening of the tibial component represents the main reason for revision. Furthermore, there may be a potential improvement of fixation strength for the tibial tray achieved by increased cement penetration. In this study, the influence of pulsed lavage on mechanical stability of the tibial component and bone cement penetration was analyzed in a cadaveric setting. Six pairs of cadaveric, proximal tibia specimen underwent computed tomography (CT) for assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) and exclusion of osseous lesions. Following surgical preparation, in one side of a pair, the tibial surface was irrigated using 1800ml normal saline and pulsatile lavage, while in the other side syringe lavage using the identical amount of fluid was applied. After careful drying, bone cement was hand-pressurized on the bone surface, tibial components were inserted and impacted in an identical way. After curing of cement, specimen underwent a postimplantation CT analysis). Cement distrubution was then assessed using a three-dimenionsional visualization software. Trabecular bone, cement and implant were segmented based on an automatic thresholding algorithm, which had been validated in a previous study. This allowed to determine median cement penetration for the entire cemented area. Furthermore, fixation strength of the tibial trays was determined by a vertical pull-out test using a servohydraulic material testing machine. Testing was performed under displacement control at a rate of 0,5mm/sec until implant failure. Data was described by median and range. Results were compared by a Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test with a type 1 error probability of 5 %. Median pull-out forces in the pulsed lavage group were 1275N (range 864–1391) and 568N (range 243–683) in the syringe lavage group (p=0.031). Cement penetration was likewise increased (p=0.031) in the pulsed lavage group (1.32mm; range 0.86–1.94), when compared to the syringe irrigated group (0.79mm; range 0.51–1.66). Failure occurred in the pulsatile lavage group at the implant-cement interface and in the syringe lavage group at the bone-cement interface, which indicates the weakness of the latter. Altogether, improved mechanical stability of the tibial implant and likewise increased bone cement interdigitation could be demonstrated in the current study, when pulsed lavage is implemented. Enhanced fixation strength was suggested being a key to improved survival of the implant. If this is the case, pulsatile lavage should be considered being a mandatory preparation step when cementing tibial components in TKA.
