Antibiotic resistance represents a threat to human health. It has been suggested that by 2050, antibiotic-resistant infections could cause ten million deaths each year. In orthopaedics, many patients undergoing surgery suffer from complications resulting from implant-associated infection. In these circumstances secondary surgery is usually required and chronic and/or relapsing disease may ensue. The development of effective treatments for antibiotic-resistant infections is needed. Recent evidence shows that bacteriophage (phages; viruses that infect bacteria) therapy may represent a viable and successful solution. In this review, a brief description of bone and joint infection and the nature of bacteriophages is presented, as well as a summary of our current knowledge on the use of bacteriophages in the treatment of bacterial infections. We present contemporary published in vitro and in vivo data as well as data from clinical trials, as they relate to bone and joint infections. We discuss the potential use of bacteriophage therapy in orthopaedic infections. This area of research is beginning to reveal successful results, but mostly in nonorthopaedic fields. We believe that bacteriophage therapy has potential therapeutic value for implant-associated infections in orthopaedics.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):234–244.

Aims

Local antibiotics are used in the surgical management of foot infection in diabetic patients. This systematic review analyzes the available evidence of the use of local antibiotic delivery systems as an adjunct to surgery.

Limited forefoot amputation in diabetic patients with osteomyelitis is frequently required. We retrospectively reviewed diabetic patients with osteomyelitis, an unhealed ulcer and blood pressure in the toe of > 45 mmHg who underwent limited amputation of the foot with primary wound closure. Between 2006 and 2012, 74 consecutive patients with a mean age of 67 years (29 to 93), and a median follow-up of 31 months, were included. All the wounds healed primarily at a median of 37 days (13 to 210; mean 48). At a median of 6 months (1.5 to 18; mean 353 days), 23 patients (31%) suffered a further ulceration. Of these, 12 patients (16% of the total) required a further amputation.

We conclude that primary wound closure following limited amputation of the foot in patients with diabetes is a safe and effective technique when associated with appropriate antibiotic treatment.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1083–7.

Between 2000 and 2006 we performed salvage tibiotalar arthrodesis in 17 diabetic patients (17 ankles) with grossly unstable ankles caused by bimalleolar fractures complicated by Charcot neuro-arthropathy. There were ten women and seven men with a mean age of 61.6 years (57 to 69). A crossed-screw technique was used. Two screws were used in eight patients and three screws in nine. Additional graft from the malleoli was used in all patients. The mean follow-up was 26 months (12 to 48) and the mean time to union was 5.8 months (4 to 8). A stable ankle was achieved in 14 patients (82.4%), nine of whom had bony fusion and five had a stiff fibrous union. The results were significantly better in underweight patients, in those in whom surgery had been performed three to six months after the onset of acute Charcot arthropathy, in those who had received anti-resorptive medication during the acute stage, in those without extensive peripheral neuropathy, and in those with adequate peripheral oxygen saturation (> 95%). The arthrodesis failed because of avascular necrosis of the talus in only three patients (17.6%), who developed grossly unstable, ulcerated hindfeet, and required below-knee amputation.

We reviewed all patients with a clinically infected foot ulcer attending a specialised neuropathic foot clinic. Neuropathy was confirmed by the inability to feel a 5.07 Semmes-Weinstein hair, areflexia and impaired vibration sense, as measured by a biothesiometer.

Of 40 patients who attended the clinic over a two-year period, six with ischaemic ulcers were excluded. The remaining 34 had plain radiographs of the foot followed by a ^99mTc-MDP bone scan. If the latter was positive, an ¹¹¹In-labelled WBC scan was performed with planar and/or tomographic dual-isotope studies where appropriate. Bone and WBC scans were performed in 31 patients. In ten, isotope imaging showed infection localised to the soft tissues only and conservative treatment was successful in them all. Eighteen patients were treated surgically with excision of the involved bone, which was sent for culture and histological examination.

Dual-isotope scans had a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 83%. ^99mTc-MDP bone scans with the appropriate ¹¹¹In-labelled WBC scans can reliably determine the site and extent of osteomyelitis in the neuropathic diabetic foot.