Large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements
(THR) have given rise to concern. Comparative studies of small-head
MoM THRs over a longer follow-up period are lacking. Our objective
was to compare the incidence of complications such as infection,
dislocation, revision, adverse local tissue reactions, mortality
and radiological and clinical outcomes in small-head (28 mm) MoM
and ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) THRs up to 12 years post-operatively. A prospective cohort study included 3341 THRs in 2714 patients.
The mean age was 69.1 years (range 24 to 98) and 1848 (55.3%) were
performed in women, with a mean follow-up of 115 months (18 to 201).
There were 883 MoM and 2458 CoP bearings. Crude incidence rates
(cases/1000 person-years) were: infection 1.3 In conclusion, we found similar results for small-head MoM and
CoP bearings up to ten years post-operatively, but after ten years
MoM THRs had a higher risk of all-cause revision. Furthermore, the
presence of an adverse response to metal debris seen in the small-head
MOM group at revision is a cause for concern. Cite this article:
Patients from a randomised trial on resurfacing
hip arthroplasty (RHA) (n = 36, 19 males; median age 57 years, 24
to 65) comparing a conventional 28 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty
(MoM THA) (n = 28, 17 males; median age 59 years, 37 to 65) and
a matched control group of asymptomatic patients with a 32 mm ceramic-on-polyethylene
(CoP) THA (n = 33, 18 males; median age 63 years, 38 to 71) were
cross-sectionally screened with metal artefact reducing sequence-MRI
(MARS-MRI) for pseudotumour formation at a median of 55 months (23
to 72) post-operatively. MRIs were scored by consensus according
to three different classification systems for pseudotumour formation. Clinical scores were available for all patients and metal ion
levels for MoM bearing patients. Periprosthetic lesions with a median volume of 16 mL (1.5 to
35.9) were diagnosed in six patients in the RHA group (17%), one
in the MoM THA group (4%) and six in the CoP group (18%). The classification
systems revealed no clear differences between the groups. Solid
lesions (n = 3) were exclusively encountered in the RHA group. Two patients
in the RHA group and one in the MoM THA group underwent a revision
for pseudotumour formation. There was no statistically significant
relationship between clinical scoring, metal ion levels and periprosthetic
lesions in any of the groups. Periprosthetic fluid collections are seen on MARS-MRI after conventional
CoP THA and RHA and may reflect a soft-tissue collection or effusion. Currently available MRI classification systems seem to score
these collections as pseudotumours, causing an-overestimatation
of the incidence of pseudotumours. Cite this article:
