We report a systematic review and meta-analysis
of the peer-reviewed literature focusing on metal sensitivity testing
in patients undergoing total joint replacement (TJR). Our purpose
was to assess the risk of developing metal hypersensitivity post-operatively
and its relationship with outcome and to investigate the advantages
of performing hypersensitivity testing. We undertook a comprehensive search of the
α-defensin is a biomarker which has been described as having
a high degree of accuracy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint
infection (PJI). Current meta-analyses are based on the α-defensin
laboratory-based immunoassay rather than the quick on-table lateral
flow test kit. This study is the first meta-analysis to compare the
accuracy of the α-defensin laboratory-based immunoassay and the
lateral flow test kit for the diagnosis of PJI. A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Inclusion criteria were all clinical studies where the diagnosis
of PJI was uncertain. All studies selected used the Musculoskeletal
Infection Society (MSIS) or modified MSIS criteria. Two independent
reviewers reviewed the studies and extracted data. A meta-analysis
of results was carried out: pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive
and negative likelihood ratio, heterogeneity and areas under curves
are reported.Aims
Materials and Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a potential treatment
for isolated bone on bone osteoarthritis when limited to a single
compartment. The risk for revision of UKA is three times higher
than for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this review was
to discuss the different revision options after UKA failure. A search was performed for English language articles published
between 2006 and 2016. After reviewing titles and abstracts, 105
papers were selected for further analysis. Of these, 39 papers were
deemed to contain clinically relevant data to be included in this review.Objectives
Materials and Methods
In this systematic review, our aim was to explore
whether or not patients are able to return to athletic activity
following lower limb joint replacement. We also investigated any evidence
as to whether participation in athletic activity post-joint replacement
increases complications and reduces implant survival. A PubMed, Embase and Sports Discus search was performed using
the MeSH terms ‘Sport’, ‘Athletic’, ‘Athlete’, ‘Physical’, ‘Activity’,
‘Arthroplasty’, ‘Total Hip Replacement’, ‘Hip Resurfacing’, ‘Total
Knee Replacement’, ‘Unicompartmental Knee Replacement’ and ‘Unicondylar
Knee Replacement’. From this search, duplications were excluded,
the remaining abstracts were reviewed and any unrelated to the search
terms were excluded. The remaining abstracts had their full papers
reviewed. Following joint replacement, participation in sporting activity
is common principally determined by pre-operative patient activity
levels, BMI and patient age. The type of joint replaced is of less
significance. Total time spent performing activity does not change
but tends to be at a lower intensity. There is little evidence in
the literature of an association between high activity levels and
early implant failure. Cite this article:
We reviewed systematically the published evidence on the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for the reduction of wound infection in patients undergoing total hip and total knee replacement. Publications were identified using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. We also contacted authors to identify unpublished trials. We included randomised controlled trials which compared any prophylaxis with none, the administration of systemic antibiotics with that of those in cement, cephalosporins with glycopeptides, cephalosporins with penicillin-derivatives, and second-generation with first-generation cephalosporins. A total of 26 studies (11 343 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was variable. In a meta-analysis of seven studies (3065 participants) antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the absolute risk of wound infection by 8% and the relative risk by 81% compared with no prophylaxis (p <
0.00001). No other comparison showed a significant difference in clinical effect. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be routine in joint replacement but the choice of agent should be made on the basis of cost and local availability.
