Lisfranc injuries were previously described as fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints. With advancements in modern imaging, subtle Lisfranc injuries are now more frequently recognized, revealing that their true incidence is much higher than previously thought. Injury patterns can vary widely in severity and anatomy. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to achieve good outcomes. The original classification systems were anatomy-based, and limited as tools for guiding treatment. The current review, using the best available evidence, instead introduces a stability-based classification system, with weightbearing radiographs and CT serving as key diagnostic tools. Stable injuries generally have good outcomes with nonoperative management, most reliably treated with immobilization and non-weightbearing for six weeks. Displaced or comminuted injuries require surgical intervention, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) being the most common approach, with a consensus towards bridge plating. While ORIF generally achieves satisfactory results, its effectiveness can vary, particularly in high-energy injuries. Primary arthrodesis remains niche for the treatment of acute injuries, but may offer benefits such as lower rates of post-traumatic arthritis and hardware removal. Novel fixation techniques, including suture button fixation, aim to provide flexible stabilization, which theoretically could improve midfoot biomechanics and reduce complications. Early findings suggest promising functional outcomes, but further studies are required to validate this method compared with established techniques. Future research should focus on refining stability-based classification systems, validation of weightbearing CT, improving rehabilitation protocols, and optimizing surgical techniques for various injury patterns to ultimately enhance patient outcomes. Cite this article:
Osteochondral lesions (OCLs) occur in up to 70%
of sprains and fractures involving the ankle. Atraumatic aetiologies have
also been described. Techniques such as microfracture, and replacement
strategies such as autologous osteochondral transplantation, or
autologous chondrocyte implantation are the major forms of surgical
treatment. Current literature suggests that microfracture is indicated
for lesions up to 15 mm in diameter, with replacement strategies
indicated for larger or cystic lesions. Short- and medium-term results
have been reported, where concerns over potential deterioration
of fibrocartilage leads to a need for long-term evaluation. Biological augmentation may also be used in the treatment of
OCLs, as they potentially enhance the biological environment for
a natural healing response. Further research is required to establish
the critical size of defect, beyond which replacement strategies
should be used, as well as the most appropriate use of biological augmentation.
This paper reviews the current evidence for surgical management
and use of biological adjuncts for treatment of osteochondral lesions
of the talus. Cite this article:
