We report our experience of revision total hip
replacement (THR) using the Revitan curved modular titanium fluted revision
stem in patients with a full spectrum of proximal femoral defects.
A total of 112 patients (116 revisions) with a mean age of 73.4
years (39 to 90) were included in the study. The mean follow-up
was 7.5 years (5.3 to 9.1). A total of 12 patients (12 hips) died
but their data were included in the survival analysis, and four
patients (4 hips) were lost to follow-up. The clinical outcome,
proximal bone regeneration and subsidence were assessed for 101
hips. The mean Harris Hip Score was 88.2 (45.8 to 100) after five years
and there was an increase of the mean Barnett and Nordin-Score,
a measure of the proximal bone regeneration, of 20.8 (-3.1 to 52.7).
Five stems had to be revised (4.3%), three (2.9%) showed subsidence,
five (4.3%) a dislocation and two of 85 aseptic revisions (2.3%)
a periprosthetic infection. At the latest follow-up, the survival with revision of the stem
as the endpoint was 95.7% (95% confidence interval 91.9% to 99.4%)
and with aseptic loosening as the endpoint, was 100%. Peri-prosthetic
fractures were not observed. We report excellent results with respect to subsidence, the risk
of fracture, and loosening after femoral revision using a modular
curved revision stem with distal cone-in-cone fixation. A successful
outcome depends on careful pre-operative planning and the use of
a transfemoral approach when the anatomy is distorted or a fracture
is imminent, or residual cement or a partially-secured existing
stem cannot be removed. The shortest appropriate stem should, in
our opinion, be used and secured with >
3 cm fixation at the femoral
isthmus, and distal interlocking screws should be used for additional
stability when this goal cannot be realised. Cite this article:
We reviewed the outcome of curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in 20 hips. A mean varus angulation of 31° was obtained by the osteotomy. The ratio of intact area on the weight-bearing portion increased from 19% to 61%. The mean elevation and lateral displacement of the greater trochanter were 1.2 cm and 0.5 cm, respectively. These changes in the position of the greater trochanter were very small when compared with those after conventional varus wedge osteotomy. Nonunion or delayed union was not observed. Quantitative analyses showed aggressive bone remodelling in the medial intertrochanteric region. Eighteen hips survived without collapse after a mean follow-up of 48 months. We conclude that curved varus osteotomy can be used to preserve the hip joint in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
We compared the clinical outcomes of curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy (CVO) with bone impaction grafting (BIG) with CVO alone for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This retrospective comparative study included 81 patients with ONFH; 37 patients (40 hips) underwent CVO with BIG (BIG group) and 44 patients (47 hips) underwent CVO alone (CVO group). Patients in the BIG group were followed-up for a mean of 12.2 years (10.0 to 16.5). Patients in the CVO group were followed-up for a mean of 14.5 years (10.0 to 21.0). Assessment parameters included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), complication rates, and survival rates, with conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and radiological failure as the endpoints.Aims
Methods
We evaluated a large database with mechanical failure of a single uncemented modular femoral component, used in revision hip arthroplasty, as the end point and compared them to a control group treated with the same implant. Patient- and implant-specific risk factors for implant failure were analyzed. All cases of a fractured uncemented modular revision femoral component from one manufacturer until April 2017 were identified and the total number of implants sold until April 2017 was used to calculate the fracture rate. The manufacturer provided data on patient demographics, time to failure, and implant details for all notified fractured devices. Patient- and implant-specific risk factors were evaluated using a logistic regression model with multiple imputations and compared to data from a previously published reference group, where no fractures had been observed. The results of a retrieval analysis of the fractured implants, performed by the manufacturer, were available for evaluation.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to estimate the 90-day risk of revision for periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with design features of cementless femoral stems, and to investigate the effect of a collar on this risk using a biomechanical A total of 337 647 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) from the United Kingdom National Joint Registry (NJR) were included in a multivariable survival and regression analysis to identify the adjusted hazard of revision for periprosthetic fracture following primary THA using a cementless stem. The effect of a collar in cementless THA on this risk was evaluated in an Aims
Materials and Methods
Tapered fluted titanium stems are increasingly
used for femoral revision arthroplasty. They are available in modular and
non-modular forms. Modularity has advantages when the bone loss
is severe, the proximal femur is mis shapen or the surgeon is unfamiliar
with the implant, but it introduces the risk of fracture of the
stem at the junction between it and the proximal body segment. For
that reason, and while awaiting intermediate-term results of more recently
introduced designs of this junction, non-modularity has attracted
attention, at least for straightforward revision cases. We review the risks and causes of fracture of tapered titanium
modular revision stems and present an argument in favour of the
more selective use of modular designs. Cite this article:
We compared the dynamic instability of 25 dysplastic hips in 25 patients using triaxial accelerometry before and one year after periacetabular osteotomy. We also evaluated the hips clinically using the Harris hip score and assessed acetabular orientation by radiography before surgery and after one year. The mean overall magnitude of acceleration was significantly reduced from 2.30 m/s This study suggests that periacetabular osteotomy provides pain relief, improves acetabular cover and reduces the dynamic instability in patients with dysplastic hips.
