We used immediate post-operative The bending angles in the sagittal and axial planes were significantly
greater but the coronal-bending angle was significantly less in
the transtibial group than in the anteromedial portal and outside-in
groups (p <
0.001 each). The mean length of the femoral tunnel
in all three planes was significantly greater in the transtibial
group than the anteromedial portal and outside-in groups (p <
0.001 each), but all mean tunnel lengths in the three groups exceeded
30 mm. The only significant difference was the coronal graft- bending
angle in the anteromedial portal and outside-in groups (23.5° Compared with the transtibial technique, the anteromedial portal
and outside-in techniques may reduce the graft-bending stress at
the opening of the femoral tunnel. Despite the femoral tunnel length
being shorter in the anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques
than in the transtibial technique, a femoral tunnel length of more than
30 mm in the anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques may be
sufficient for the graft to heal. Cite this article:
Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction
is used to treat patellar instability and recurrent patellar dislocation.
Anatomical studies have found the MPFL to be a double-bundle structure.
We carried out a meta-analysis of studies reporting outcomes of
patellofemoral reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft in
a double-bundle configuration and patellar fixation via mediolateral
patellar tunnels. A literature search was undertaken with no language restriction
in various databases from their year of inception to July 2012.
The primary outcome examined was the post-operative Kujala score.
We identified 320 MPFL reconstructions in nine relevant articles.
The combined mean post-operative Kujala score was 92.02 (standard
error ( Cite this article:
We conducted a randomised prospective study to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement of similar design in 174 patients who had bilateral simultaneous knee replacement. The mean follow-up was for 5.6 years (5.2 to 6.1). The total knee score, pain score, functional score and range of movement were not statistically different (p >
0.05) between the two groups. Osteolysis was not seen in any knee in either group. Two knees (1%) in the mobile-bearing group required revision because of infection; none in the fixed-bearing group needed revision. Excellent results can be achieved with both mobile- and fixed-bearing prostheses of similar design at mid-term follow-up. We could demonstrate no significant clinical advantage for a mobile bearing.