The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate differences in functional outcomes and complications between single- (SI) and double-incision (DI) techniques for the treatment of distal biceps tendon rupture. A comprehensive search on PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Central databases was conducted to identify studies reporting comparative results of the SI versus the DI approach. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was used for search strategy. Of 606 titles, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria; methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Random- and fixed-effects models were used to find differences in outcomes between the two surgical approaches. The range of motion (ROM) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, as well as neurological and non-neurological complications, were assessed.Aims
Methods
There has been an evolution recently in the management of unstable
fractures of the ankle with a trend towards direct fixation of a
posterior malleolar fragment. Within these fractures, Haraguchi
type 2 fractures extend medially and often cannot be fixed using
a standard posterolateral approach. Our aim was to describe the
posteromedial approach to address these fractures and to assess
its efficacy and safety. We performed a review of 15 patients with a Haraguchi type 2
posterior malleolar fracture which was fixed using a posteromedial
approach. Five patients underwent initial temporary spanning external
fixation. The outcome was assessed at a median follow-up of 29 months (interquartile
range (IQR) 17 to 36) using the Olerud and Molander score and radiographs were
assessed for the quality of the reduction.Aims
Patients and Methods
Talonavicular and subtalar joint fusion through
a medial incision (modified triple arthrodesis) has become an increasingly
popular technique for treating symptomatic flatfoot deformity caused
by posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to look at its clinical and radiological
mid- to long-term outcomes, including the rates of recurrent flatfoot
deformity, nonunion and avascular necrosis of the dome of the talus. A total of 84 patients (96 feet) with a symptomatic rigid flatfoot
deformity caused by posterior tibial tendon dysfunction were treated
using a modified triple arthrodesis. The mean age of the patients
was 66 years (35 to 85) and the mean follow-up was 4.7 years (1 to 8.3).
Both clinical and radiological outcomes were analysed retrospectively. In 86 of the 95 feet (90.5%) for which radiographs were available,
there was no loss of correction at final follow-up. In all, 14 feet
(14.7%) needed secondary surgery, six for nonunion, two for avascular
necrosis, five for progression of the flatfoot deformity and tibiotalar
arthritis and one because of symptomatic overcorrection. The mean
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hindfoot score (AOFAS
score) at final follow-up was 67 (between 16 and 100) and the mean
visual analogue score for pain 2.4 points (between 0 and 10). In conclusion, modified triple arthrodesis provides reliable
correction of deformity and a good clinical outcome at mid- to long-term
follow-up, with nonunion as the most frequent complication. Avascular
necrosis of the talus is a rare but serious complication of this
technique. Cite this article:
Coronal plane fractures of the posterior femoral
condyle, also known as Hoffa fractures, are rare. Lateral fractures are
three times more common than medial fractures, although the reason
for this is not clear. The exact mechanism of injury is likely to
be a vertical shear force on the posterior femoral condyle with
varying degrees of knee flexion. These fractures are commonly associated
with high-energy trauma and are a diagnostic and surgical challenge. Hoffa
fractures are often associated with inter- or supracondylar distal
femoral fractures and CT scans are useful in delineating the coronal
shear component, which can easily be missed. There are few recommendations
in the literature regarding the surgical approach and methods of
fixation that may be used for this injury. Non-operative treatment
has been associated with poor outcomes. The goals of treatment are
anatomical reduction of the articular surface with rigid, stable
fixation to allow early mobilisation in order to restore function.
A surgical approach that allows access to the posterior aspect of
the femoral condyle is described and the use of postero-anterior
lag screws with or without an additional buttress plate for fixation
of these difficult fractures. Cite this article:
Following the recall of modular neck hip stems
in July 2012, research into femoral modularity will intensify over
the next few years. This review aims to provide surgeons with an
up-to-date summary of the clinically relevant evidence. The development
of femoral modularity, and a classification system, is described.
The theoretical rationale for modularity is summarised and the clinical
outcomes are explored. The review also examines the clinically relevant problems
reported following the use of femoral stems with a modular neck. Joint replacement registries in the United Kingdom and Australia
have provided data on the failure rates of modular devices but cannot
identify the mechanism of failure. This information is needed to
determine whether modular neck femoral stems will be used in the
future, and how we should monitor patients who already have them implanted. Cite this article:
