Obtaining solid implant fixation is crucial in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) to avoid aseptic loosening, a major reason for re-revision. This study aims to validate a novel grading system that quantifies implant fixation across three anatomical zones (epiphysis, metaphysis, diaphysis). Based on pre-, intra-, and postoperative assessments, the novel grading system allocates a quantitative score (0, 0.5, or 1 point) for the quality of fixation achieved in each anatomical zone. The criteria used by the algorithm to assign the score include the bone quality, the size of the bone defect, and the type of fixation used. A consecutive cohort of 245 patients undergoing rTKA from 2012 to 2018 were evaluated using the current novel scoring system and followed prospectively. In addition, 100 first-time revision cases were assessed radiologically from the original cohort and graded by three observers to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the novel radiological grading system.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to develop a personalized outcome prediction tool, to be used with knee arthroplasty patients, that predicts outcomes (lengths of stay (LOS), 90 day readmission, and one-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on an individual basis and allows for dynamic modifiable risk factors. Data were prospectively collected on all patients who underwent total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a between July 2015 and June 2018. Cohort 1 (n = 5,958) was utilized to develop models for LOS and 90 day readmission. Cohort 2 (n = 2,391, surgery date 2015 to 2017) was utilized to develop models for one-year improvements in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain score, KOOS function score, and KOOS quality of life (QOL) score. Model accuracies within the imputed data set were assessed through cross-validation with root mean square errors (RMSEs) and mean absolute errors (MAEs) for the LOS and PROMs models, and the index of prediction accuracy (IPA), and area under the curve (AUC) for the readmission models. Model accuracies in new patient data sets were assessed with AUC.Aims
Methods
Graft-tunnel mismatch of the bone-patellar tendon-bone
(BPTB) graft is a major concern during anatomical anterior cruciate
ligament (ACL) reconstruction if the femoral tunnel is positioned
using a far medial portal technique, as the femoral tunnel tends
to be shorter compared with that positioned using a transtibial
portal technique. This study describes an accurate method of calculating
the ideal length of bone plugs of a BPTB graft required to avoid
graft–tunnel mismatch during anatomical ACL reconstruction using
a far medial portal technique of femoral tunnel positioning. Based on data obtained intra-operatively from 60 anatomical ACL
reconstruction procedures, we calculated the length of bone plugs
required in the BPTB graft to avoid graft–tunnel mismatch. When
this was prevented in all the 60 cases, we found that the mean length
of femoral bone plug that remained in contact with the interference
screw within the femoral tunnel was 14 mm (12 to 22) and the mean
length of tibial bone plug that remained in contact with the interference
screw within the tibial tunnel was 23 mm (18 to 28). These results
were used to validate theoretical formulae developed to predict
the required length of bone plugs in BPTB graft during anatomical
ACL reconstruction using a far medial portal technique. Cite this article:
