We describe a method of pinning extension supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Following closed reduction, a posterior intrafocal wire is inserted and a second lateral wire added when needed for rotational stability. Between May 2002 and November 2005 we performed this technique in 69 consecutive patients. A single posterior wire was used in 29 cases, and two wires in 40. The mean follow-up was two years (21 to 30 months). The results were assessed according to Flynn’s criteria. In the single-wire group there were 21 excellent, five good and one poor result. Two patients were lost to follow-up. In the two-wire group there were 32 excellent, two good and three poor results. Three were lost to follow-up. The poor results were due to a failure to achieve adequate reduction, fixation or both.

We conclude that the intact posterior periosteal hinge can be used successfully in the clinical situation, giving results that compare well with other techniques of pinning. The posterior route offers an attractive alternative method for fixation of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.

We prospectively studied the benefits and risks of prolonged treatment with the Pavlik harness in infants with idiopathic developmental dysplasia of the hip. Bracing was continued as long as abduction improved. It was started at a mean age of four months (1 to 6.9). Outcome measures were the number of successful reductions, the time to reduction, the acetabular index and evidence of avascular necrosis at follow-up at one year.

In 50 infants with 62 subluxated and dislocated hips (42 Graf type III and 20 type IV), 37 were reduced successfully with a mean time to reduction of 13.4 weeks (sd 6.8). Bracing was successful in 31 type-III (73.8%) and in only six type-IV hips (20%, p = 0.002). Avascular necrosis was seen in ten hips.

Prolonged treatment with the Pavlik harness for developmental dysplasia of the hip over the age of one month can be beneficial in type-III hips, but it is unclear as to whether this is the optimal treatment, since it may postpone the need for closed or open reduction to a more unfavourable age. The use of the Pavlik harness in type-IV hips in this age group is questionable, but if used, prolonged bracing is not advised.