Aims. Reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of a periacetabular
malignancy is technically challenging and many different techniques
have been used with varying success. Our aim was to prepare a systematic
review of the literature dealing with these techniques in order
to clarify the management, the rate of complications and the outcomes. Patients and Methods. A search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for English language
articles published between January 1990 and February 2017 with combinations
of key search terms to identify studies dealing with periacetabular
resection with reconstruction in patients with a malignancy. Studies
in English that reported radiographic or clinical outcomes were
included. Data collected from each study included: the number and
type of reconstructions, the pathological diagnosis of the lesions,
the mean age and follow-up, gender distribution, implant survivorship, complications,
functional outcome, and mortality. The results from individual studies
were combined for the general analysis, and then grouped according
to the type of reconstruction. . Results. A total of 57 studies met the inclusion criteria and included
1700 patients. Most lesions were metastatic (41%), followed by chondrosarcoma
(29%), osteosarcoma (10%), Ewing’s sarcoma (7%), and multiple myeloma
(2%). The techniques of reconstruction were divided into seven types
for analysis: those involving a
Many tumors metastasise to bone, therefore, pathologic
fracture and impending pathologic fractures are common reasons for
orthopedic consultation. Having effective treatment strategies is
important to avoid complications, and relieve pain and preserve
function. Thorough pre-operative evaluation is recommended for medical
optimization and to ensure that the lesion is in fact a metastasis
and not a primary bone malignancy. For impending fractures, various scoring
systems have been proposed to determine the risk of fracture, and
therefore the need for prophylactic stabilisation. Lower score lesions
can often be treated with radiation, while more problematic lesions
may require internal fixation. Intramedullary fixation is generally
preferred due to favorable biomechanics. Arthroplasty may be required
for lesions with massive bony destruction where internal fixation
attempts are likely to fail. Radiation may also be useful postoperatively
to minimise construct failure due to tumor progression.
The painful subluxed or dislocated hip in adults
with cerebral palsy presents a challenging problem. Prosthetic dislocation
and heterotopic ossification are particular concerns. We present
the first reported series of 19 such patients (20 hips) treated
with hip resurfacing and proximal femoral osteotomy. The pre-operative
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) was level V in
13 (68%) patients, level IV in three (16%), level III in one (5%) and
level II in two (11%). The mean age at operation was 37 years (13
to 57). The mean follow-up was 8.0 years (2.7 to 11.6), and 16 of the
18 (89%) contactable patients or their carers felt that the surgery
had been worthwhile. Pain was relieved in 16 of the 18 surviving
hips (89%) at the last follow-up, and the GMFCS level had improved
in seven (37%) patients. There were two (10%) early dislocations;
three hips (15%) required revision of femoral fixation, and two
hips (10%) required revision, for late traumatic fracture of the
femoral neck and extra-articular impingement, respectively. Hence
there were significant surgical complications in a total of seven
hips (35%). No hips required revision for instability, and there
were no cases of heterotopic ossification. We recommend hip resurfacing with proximal femoral osteotomy
for the treatment of the painful subluxed or dislocated hip in patients
with cerebral palsy.