Most animal studies indicate that early irrigation
and debridement reduce infection after an open fracture. Unfortunately,
these studies often do not involve antibiotics. Clinical studies
indicate that the timing of initial debridement does not affect
the rate of infection but these studies are observational and fraught
with confounding variables. The purpose of this study was to control
these variables using an animal model incorporating systemic antibiotics
and surgical treatment. We used a rat femur model with a defect which was contaminated
with No animal that received antibiotics and surgery two hours after
injury had detectable bacteria. When antibiotics were started at
two hours, a delay in surgical treatment from two to six hours significantly
increased the development of infection (p = 0.047). However, delaying
surgery to 24 hours increase the rate of infection, but not significantly
(p = 0.054). The timing of antibiotics had a more significant effect
on the proportion of positive samples than earlier surgery. Delaying
antibiotics to six or 24 hours had a profoundly detrimental effect
on the infection rate regardless of the timing of surgery. These
findings are consistent with the concept that bacteria progress
from a vulnerable planktonic form to a treatment-resistant biofilm.
Despite long-standing dogma, a clear relationship between the timing of surgical irrigation and debridement (I&D) and the development of subsequent deep infection has not been established in the literature. Traditionally, I&D of an open fracture has been recommended within six hours of injury based on animal studies from the 1970s, however the clinical basis for this remains unclear. Using data from a multicentre randomized controlled trial of 2,447 open fracture patients, the primary objective of this secondary analysis is to determine if a relationship exists between timing of wound I&D (within six hours of injury vs beyond six hours) and subsequent reoperation rate for infection or healing complications within one year for patients with open limb fractures requiring surgical treatment. To adjust for the influence of patient and injury characteristics on the timing of I&D, a propensity score was developed from the dataset. Propensity-adjusted regression allowed for a matched cohort analysis within the study population to determine if early irrigation put patients independently at risk for reoperation, while controlling for confounding factors. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values. All analyses were conducted using STATA 14.Aims
Methods
The Fluid Lavage in Open Fracture Wounds (FLOW) trial was a multicentre,
blinded, randomized controlled trial that used a 2 × 3 factorial
design to evaluate the effect of irrigation solution (soap Participants completed the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and the EuroQol-5
Dimensions (EQ-5D) at baseline (pre-injury recall), at two and six
weeks, and at three, six, nine and 12-months post-fracture. We calculated
the Physical Component Score (PCS) and the Mental Component Score
(MCS) of the SF-12 and the EQ-5D utility score, conducted an analysis
using a multi-level generalized linear model, and compared differences
between the baseline and 12-month scores.Aims
Patients and Methods
This 501-patient, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial sought
to establish the effect of low-intensity, pulsed, ultrasound (LIPUS)
on tibial shaft fractures managed with intramedullary nailing. We
conducted an economic evaluation as part of this trial. Data for patients’ use of post-operative healthcare resources
and time taken to return to work were collected and costed using
publicly available sources. Health-related quality of life, assessed
using the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 (HUI-3), was used to derive
quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs and QALYs were compared
between LIPUS and control (a placebo device) from a payer and societal
perspective using non-parametric bootstrapping. All costs are reported
in 2015 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated.Aims
Patients and Methods
In a randomised prospective study, 20 patients with intra-articular fractures of the distal radius underwent arthroscopically- and fluoroscopically-assisted reduction and external fixation plus percutaneous pinning. Another group of 20 patients with the same fracture characteristics underwent fluoroscopically-assisted reduction alone and external fixation plus percutaneous pinning. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically at follow-up of 24 months. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and modified Mayo wrist score were used at 3, 9, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. In the arthroscopically- and fluoroscopically-assisted group, triangular fibrocartilage complex tears were found in 12 patients (60%), complete or incomplete scapholunate ligament tears in nine (45%), and lunotriquetral ligament tears in four (20%). They were treated either arthroscopically or by open operation. Patients who underwent arthroscopically- and fluoroscopically-assisted treatment had significantly better supination, extension and flexion at all time points than those who had fluoroscopically-assisted surgery. The mean DASH scores were similar for both groups at 24 months, whereas the difference in the mean modified Mayo wrist scores remained statistically significant. Although the groups are small, it is clear that the addition of arthroscopy to the fluoroscopically-assisted treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures improves the outcome. Better treatment of associated intra-articular injuries might also have been a reason for the improved outcome.
