Open discectomy (OD) is the standard operation for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), however, has shown similar outcomes to OD and there is increasing interest in this procedure. However despite improved surgical techniques and instrumentation, reoperation and infection rates continue and are reported to be between 6% and 24% and 0.7% and 16%, respectively. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of reoperation and infection within six months of patients being treated for LDH either by OD or PELD. In this retrospective, nationwide cohort study, the Korean National Health Insurance database from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2018 was reviewed. Data were extracted for patients who underwent OD or PELD for LDH without a history of having undergone either procedure during the preceding year. Individual patients were followed for six months through their encrypted unique resident registration number. The primary endpoints were rates of reoperation and infection during the follow-up period. Other risk factors for reoperation and infection were also evalulated.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine whether there is an increased prevalence of scoliosis in patients who have suffered from a haematopoietic malignancy in childhood. Patients with a history of lymphoma or leukaemia with a current age between 12 and 25 years were identified from the regional paediatric oncology database. The medical records and radiological findings were reviewed, and any spinal deformity identified. The treatment of the malignancy and the spinal deformity, if any, was noted.Aims
Methods
Spinal tuberculosis (TB) remains an important concern. Although spinal TB often has sequelae such as myelopathy after treatment, the predictive factors affecting such unfavourable outcomes are not yet established. We investigated the clinical manifestations and predictors of unfavourable treatment outcomes in patients with spinal TB. We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study of patients with spinal TB. Unfavourable outcome was defined according to previous studies. The prognostic factors for unfavourable outcomes as the primary outcome were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis and a linear mixed model was used to compare time course of inflammatory markers during treatment. A total of 185 patients were included, of whom 59 patients had unfavourable outcomes.Aims
Patients and Methods
Pain catastrophising is an adverse coping mechanism,
involving an exaggerated response to anticipated or actual pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of
pain ‘catastrophising’, as measured using the pain catastrophising
scale (PCS), on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal
stenosis (LSS). A total of 138 patients (47 men and 91 women, mean age 65.9;
45 to 78) were assigned to low (PCS score <
25, n = 68) and high
(PCS score ≥ 25, n = 70) PCS groups. The primary outcome measure
was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 12 months after surgery.
Secondary outcome measures included the ODI and visual analogue
scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, which were recorded at each assessment
conducted during the 12-month follow-up period The overall changes in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain
over a 12-month period were significantly different between the
groups (ODI, p <
0.001; VAS for back pain, p <
0.001; VAS
for leg pain, p = 0.040). The ODI and VAS for back and leg pain
significantly decreased over time after surgery in both groups (p
<
0.001 for all three variables). The patterns of change in the
ODI and VAS for back pain during the follow-up period significantly
differed between the two groups, suggesting that the PCS group is
a potential treatment moderator. However, there was no difference
in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain between the low and high
PCS groups 12 months after surgery. In terms of minimum clinically important differences in ODI scores
(12.8), 22 patients (40.7%) had an unsatisfactory surgical outcome
in the low PCS group and 16 (32.6%) in the high PCS group. There
was no statistically significant difference between the two groups
(p = 0.539). Pre-operative catastrophising did not always result in a poor
outcome 12 months after surgery, which indicates that this could
moderate the efficacy of surgery for LSS. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to determine whether
obesity affects pain, surgical and functional outcomes following lumbar
spinal fusion for low back pain (LBP). A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was made of
those studies that compared the outcome of lumbar spinal fusion
for LBP in obese and non-obese patients. A total of 17 studies were
included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference in the pain
and functional outcomes. Lumbar spinal fusion in the obese patient resulted
in a statistically significantly greater intra-operative blood loss
(weighted mean difference: 54.04 ml; 95% confidence interval (CI)
15.08 to 93.00; n = 112; p = 0.007) more complications (odds ratio:
1.91; 95% CI 1.68 to 2.18; n = 43858; p <
0.001) and longer duration
of surgery (25.75 mins; 95% CI 15.61 to 35.90; n = 258; p <
0.001). Obese
patients have greater intra-operative blood loss, more complications
and longer duration of surgery but pain and functional outcome are
similar to non-obese patients. Based on these results, obesity is
not a contraindication to lumbar spinal fusion. Cite this article:
