To prevent insufficiency of the triceps after
total elbow arthroplasty, we have, since 2008, used a triceps-sparing ulnar
approach. This study evaluates the clinical results and post-operative
alignment of the prosthesis using this approach. We reviewed 25 elbows in 23 patients. There were five men and
18 women with a mean age of 69 years (54 to 83). There were 18 elbows
with rheumatoid arthritis, six with a fracture or pseudoarthrosis
and one elbow with osteoarthritis. Post-operative complications included one intra-operative fracture,
one elbow with heterotopic ossification, one transient ulnar nerve
palsy, and one elbow with skin necrosis, but no elbow was affected
by insufficiency of the triceps. Patients were followed for a mean of 42 months (24 to 77). The
mean post-operative Japanese Orthopaedic Association Elbow Score
was 90.8 (51 to 100) and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance score 93.8
(65 to 100). The mean post-operative flexion/extension of the elbow
was 135°/-8°. The Manual Muscle Testing score of the triceps was
5 in 23 elbows and 2 in two elbows (one patient). The mean alignment
of the implants examined by 3D-CT was 2.8° pronation (standard deviation
( The triceps-sparing ulnar approach allows satisfactory alignment
of the implants, is effective in preventing post-operative triceps
insufficiency, and gives satisfactory short-term results. Cite this article: 2015;97-B:1096–1101.
We retrospectively assessed the value of identifying
impinging osteophytes using dynamic computer simulation of CT scans
of the elbow in assisting their arthroscopic removal in patients
with osteoarthritis of the elbow. A total of 20 patients were treated
(19 men and one woman, mean age 38 years (19 to 55)) and followed
for a mean of 25 months (24 to 29). We located the impinging osteophytes
dynamically using computerised three-dimensional models of the elbow
based on CT data in three positions of flexion of the elbow. These
were then removed arthroscopically and a capsular release was performed. The mean loss of extension improved from 23° (10° to 45°) pre-operatively
to 9° (0° to 25°) post-operatively, and the mean flexion improved
from 121° (80° to 140°) pre-operatively to 130° (110° to 145°) post-operatively.
The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 62 (30 to 85)
to 95 (70 to 100) post-operatively. All patients had pain in the
elbow pre-operatively which disappeared or decreased post-operatively.
According to their Mayo scores, 14 patients had an excellent clinical
outcome and six a good outcome; 15 were very satisfied and five
were satisfied with their post-operative outcome. We recommend this technique in the surgical management of patients
with osteoarthritis of the elbow. Cite this article:
