We present a series of 48 patients with infected total knee replacements managed by the use of articulating cement spacers and short-term parenteral antibiotic therapy in the postoperative period. All patients had microbiological and/or histological confirmation of infection at the first stage of their revision. They all underwent
Seven stiff total knee arthroplasties are presented
to illustrate the roles of: 1) manipulation under general anesthesia;
2) multiple concurrent diagnoses in addition to stiffness; 3) extra-articular
pathology; 4) pain as part of the stiffness triad (pain and limits
to flexion or extension); 5) component internal rotation; 6) multifactorial
etiology; and 7) surgical exposure in this challenging clinical
problem.
All major studies have incorporated the use of prolonged courses of parenteral or oral antibiotic therapy in the management of two-stage revision of an infected total knee arthroplasty. We present a series of 59 consecutive patients, all with microbiologically-proven deep infection of a total knee arthroplasty, in whom a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy was not routinely used. The mean follow-up was 56.4 months (24 to 114). Of the 38 patients who underwent a staged exchange, infection was successfully eradicated in 34 (89%) but recurrent or persistent infection was present in four (11%). Our rate of cure for infection is similar to that reported elsewhere. We conclude that a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy seems not to alter the incidence of recurrent or persistent infection. The costs of the administration of antibiotics are high and such a regime may be unnecessary.
In this paper, we consider wound healing after
total knee arthroplasty.
A soft-tissue defect over an infected total knee
replacement (TKR) presents a difficult technical problem that can
be treated with a gastrocnemius flap, which is rotated over the
defect during the first-stage of a revision procedure. This facilitates
wound healing and the safe introduction of a prosthesis at the second
stage. We describe the outcome at a mean follow-up of 4.5 years
(1 to 10) in 24 patients with an infected TKR who underwent this procedure.
A total of 22 (92%) eventually obtained a satisfactory result. The
mean Knee Society score improved from 53 pre-operatively to 103
at the latest follow-up (p <
0.001). The mean Western Ontario
and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index and Short-Form 12
score also improved significantly (p <
0.001). This form of treatment can be used reliably and safely to treat
many of these complex cases where control of infection, retention
of the components and acceptable functional recovery are the primary
goals. Cite this article:
We analysed whether a high body mass index (BMI)
had a deleterious effect on outcome following autologous chondrocyte
implantation (ACI) or matrix-carried autologous chondrocyte implantation
(MACI) for the treatment of full-thickness chondral defects of the
knee from a subset of patients enrolled in the ACI vs MACI trial
at The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital. The mean Modified Cincinnati scores (MCS) were significantly
higher (p <
0.001) post-operatively in patients who had an ideal
body weight (n = 53; 20 to 24.9 kg/m2) than in overweight
(n = 63; 25 to 30 kg/m2) and obese patients (n = 22;
>
30 kg/m2). At a follow-up of two years, obese patients
demonstrated no sustained improvement in the MCS. Patients with
an ideal weight experienced significant improvements as early as
six months after surgery (p = 0.007). In total, 82% of patients
(31 of 38) in the ideal group had a good or excellent result, compared
with 49% (22 of 45) of the overweight and 5.5% (one of 18) in the
obese group (p <
0.001). There was a significant negative relationship between
BMI and the MCS 24 months after surgery (r = -0.4, p = 0.001). This study demonstrates that obese patients have worse knee function
before surgery and experience no sustained benefit from ACI or MACI
at two years after surgery. There was a correlation between increasing
BMI and a lower MCS according to a linear regression analysis. On
the basis of our findings patient selection can be more appropriately
targeted.
We undertook a study in which 138 female patients with a mean age of 71.2 years (51 to 82) received a standard NexGen CR-flex prosthesis in one knee and a gender-specific NexGen CR-flex prosthesis in the other. The mean follow-up period was 3.25 years (3.1 to 3.5). The aspect ratios of the standard and gender-specific prostheses were compared with that of the distal femur. The mean post-operative Knee Society knee scores were 94 (70 to 100) and 93 (70 to 100) points and the function scores were 83 (60 to 100) and 84 (60 to 100) points for the standard implants and the gender-specific designs, respectively. The mean post-operative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities score was 26.4 points (0 to 76). Patient satisfaction, the radiological results and the complication rates were similar in the two groups. In those with a standard prosthesis, the femoral component was closely matched in 80 knees (58.0%), overhung in 14 (10.1%) and undercovered the bone in 44 (31.9%). In those with a gender-specific prosthesis, it was closely matched in 15 knees (10.9%) and undercovered the bone in 123 (89.1%). Since we found no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the clinical and radiological results, patient satisfaction or complication rate, the goal of the design of the gender-specific CR-flex prosthesis to improve the outcome was not achieved in our patients.