The impact of concomitant injuries in patients with proximal femoral fractures has rarely been studied. To date, the few studies published have been mostly single-centre research focusing on the influence of upper limb fractures. A retrospective cohort analysis was, therefore, conducted to identify the impact and distribution of concomitant injuries in patients with proximal femoral fractures. A retrospective, multicentre registry-based study was undertaken. Between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2019, data for 24,919 patients from 100 hospitals were collected in the Registry for Geriatric Trauma. This information was queried and patient groups with and without concomitant injury were compared using linear and logistic regression models. In addition, we analyzed the influence of the different types of additional injuries.Aims
Methods
Benefits of early stabilization of femoral shaft fractures, in mitigation of pulmonary and other complications, have been recognized over the past decades. Investigation into the appropriate level of resuscitation, and other measures of readiness for definitive fixation, versus a damage control strategy have been ongoing. These principles are now being applied to fractures of the thoracolumbar spine, pelvis, and acetabulum. Systems of trauma care are evolving to encompass attention to expeditious and safe management of not only multiply injured patients with these major fractures, but also definitive care for hip and periprosthetic fractures, which pose a similar burden of patient recumbency until stabilized. Future directions regarding refinement of patient resuscitation, assessment, and treatment are anticipated, as is the potential for data sharing and registries in enhancing trauma system functionality. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to determine whether early surgical treatment results in better neurological recovery 12 months after injury than late surgical treatment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Patients with tSCI requiring surgical spinal decompression presenting to 17 centres in Europe were recruited. Depending on the timing of decompression, patients were divided into early (≤ 12 hours after injury) and late (> 12 hours and < 14 days after injury) groups. The American Spinal Injury Association neurological (ASIA) examination was performed at baseline (after injury but before decompression) and at 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change in Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS) from baseline to 12 months.Aims
Methods
1. The theories that have been advanced to explain the occurrence of traumatic tetraplegia in patients without evidence of
Twelve cases of sternal injury associated with spinal fractures have been reviewed. The sternum is regularly buckled or fractured in patients with high thoracic spinal fractures. Our review suggests that sternal injuries may also be associated with spinal fractures outside this region, and with types of fracture other than crushing of vertebral bodies. Injury to the sternum, when due to indirect violence, is almost always associated with a severe
The timing of surgical fixation in spinal fractures is a contentious topic. Existing literature suggests that early stabilization leads to reduced morbidity, improved neurological outcomes, and shorter hospital stay. However, the quality of evidence is low and equivocal with regard to the safety of early fixation in the severely injured patient. This paper compares complication profiles between spinal fractures treated with early fixation and those treated with late fixation. All patients transferred to a national tertiary spinal referral centre for primary surgical fixation of unstable spinal injuries without preoperative neurological deficit between 1 July 2016 and 20 October 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Data were collected retrospectively. Patients were divided into early and late cohorts based on timing from initial trauma to first spinal operation. Early fixation was defined as within 72 hours, and late fixation beyond 72 hours.Aims
Methods
Twenty-two cases of paraplegia complicating injury of the cervical column have been reviewed. The vertebral injury may be due to flexion or hyperextension violence. Flexion injuryâThere are three types of flexion injury: 1) dislocation; 2) compression fracture of a vertebral body; 3) acute retropulsion of an intervertebral disc. Evidence is presented in support of the view that disc protrusion is the cause of the cord lesion when there is no radiographic evidence of bone injury, and in some cases at least when there is a compression fracture. Treatment is discussed and the indications for caliper traction and laminectomy are presented. Hyperextension injurvâThere are two types of hyperextension injury: 1) dislocation; 2) injury to arthritic
The aim of this study was first, to determine
whether CT scans undertaken to identify serious injury to the viscera were
of use in detecting clinically unrecognised fractures of the thoracolumbar
vertebrae, and second, to identify patients at risk of ‘missed injury’. We retrospectively analysed CT scans of the chest and abdomen
performed for blunt injury to the torso in 303 patients. These proved
to be positive for thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in only
2% and 1.3% of cases, respectively. However, 51 (16.8%) showed a
fracture of the thoracolumbar vertebrae and these constituted our subset
for study. There were eight women and 43 men with mean age of 45.2
years (15 to 94). There were 29 (57%) stable and 22 (43%) unstable
fractures. Only 17 fractures (33.3%) had been anticipated after
clinical examination. Of the 22 unstable fractures, 11 (50%) were
anticipated. Thus, within the whole group of 303 patients, an unstable spinal
injury was missed in 11 patients (3.6%); no harm resulted as they
were all protected until the spine had been cleared. A subset analysis
revealed that patients with a high Injury Severity Score, a low
Glasgow Coma Scale and haemodynamic instability were most likely
to have a significant fracture in the absence of positive clinical
findings. This is the group at greatest risk. Clinical examination alone cannot detect significant fractures
of the thoracolumbar spine. It should be combined with CT imaging
to reduce the risk of missed injury.
We report on the use of the Ilizarov method to
treat 40 consecutive fractures of the tibial shaft (35 AO 42C fractures and
five AO 42B3 fractures) in adults. There were 28 men and
12 women with a mean age of 43 years (19 to 81). The series included
19 open fractures (six Gustilo grade 3A and 13 grade 3B) and 21
closed injuries. The mean time from injury to application of definitive
Ilizarov frame was eight days (0 to 35) with 36 fractures successfully
uniting without the need for any bone-stimulating procedure. The
four remaining patients with nonunion healed with a second frame.
There were no amputations and no deep infections. None required
intervention for malunion. The total time to healing was calculated
from date of injury to removal of the frame, with a median of 166
days (mean 187, (87 to 370)). Minor complications included snapped
wires in two patients and minor pin-site infections treated with
oral antibiotics in nine patients (23%). Clinical scores were available
for 32 of the 40 patients at a median of 55 months (mean 62, (26
to 99)) post-injury, with ‘good’ Olerud and Molander ankle scores
(median 80, mean 75, (10 to 100)), ‘excellent’ Lysholm knee scores
(median 97, mean 88, (29 to 100)), a median Tegner activity score
of 4 (mean 4, (0 to 9)) (comparable to ‘moderately heavy labour
/ cycling and jogging’) and Short Form-12 scores that exceeded the
mean of the population as a whole (median physical component score
55 (mean 51, (20 to 64)), median mental component score 57 (mean
53, (21 to 62)). In conclusion, the Ilizarov method is a safe and
reliable way of treating complex tibial shaft fractures with a high
rate of primary union.
We report the results of performing a pronating osteotomy of the radius, coupled with other soft-tissue procedures, as part of an upper limb functional surgery programme in tetraplegic patients with supination contractures. In total 12 patients were reviewed with a mean follow-up period of 60 months (12 to 109). Pre-operatively, passive movement ranged from a mean of 19.2° pronation (−70° to 80°) to 95.8° supination (80° to 140°). A pronating osteotomy of the radius was then performed with release of the interosseous membrane. Extension of the elbow was restored postoperatively in 11 patients, with key-pinch reconstruction in nine. At the final follow-up every patient could stabilise their hand in pronation, with a mean active range of movement of 79.6° (60° to 90°) in pronation and 50.4° (0° to 90°) in supination. No complications were observed. The mean strength of extension of the elbow was 2.7 (2 to 3) MRC grading. Pronating osteotomy stabilises the hand in pronation while preserving supination, if a complete release of the interosseous membrane is also performed. This technique fits well into surgical programmes for enhancing upper limb function.
We have reviewed our experience in managing 11 patients who sustained an indirect sternal fracture in combination with an upper thoracic spinal injury between 2003 and 2006. These fractures have previously been described as ‘associated’ fractures, but since the upper thorax is an anatomical entity composed of the upper thoracic spine, ribs and sternum joined together, we feel that the term ‘fractures of the upper transthoracic cage’ is a better description. These injuries are a challenge because they are unusual and easily overlooked. They require a systematic clinical and radiological examination to identify both lesions. This high-energy trauma gives severe devastating concomitant injuries and CT with contrast and reconstruction is essential after resuscitation to confirm the presence of all the lesions. The injury level occurs principally at T4–T5 and at the manubriosternal joint. These unstable fractures need early posterior stabilisation and fusion or, if treated conservatively, a very close follow-up.
The optimal method for the management of neglected traumatic bifacetal dislocation of the subaxial cervical spine has not been established. We treated four patients in whom the mean delay between injury and presentation was four months (1 to 5). There were two dislocations at the C5-6 level and one each at C4-5 and C3-4. The mean age of the patients was 48.2 years (27 to 60). Each patient presented with neck pain and restricted movement of the cervical spine. Three of the four had a myelopathy. We carried out a two-stage procedure under the same anaesthetic. First, a posterior soft-tissue release and partial facetectomy were undertaken. This allowed partial reduction of the dislocation which was then supplemented by interspinous wiring and corticocancellous graft. Next, through an anterior approach, discectomy, tricortical bone grafting and anterior cervical plating were carried out. All the patients achieved a nearly anatomical reduction and sagittal alignment. The mean follow-up was 2.6 years (1 to 4). The myelopathy settled completely in the three patients who had a pre-operative neurological deficit. There was no graft dislodgement or graft-related problems. Bony fusion occurred in all patients and a satisfactory reduction was maintained. The posteroanterior procedure for neglected traumatic bifacetal dislocation of the subaxial cervical spine is a good method of achieving sagittal alignment with less risk of iatrogenic neurological injury, a reduced operating time, decreased blood loss, and a shorter hospital stay compared with other procedures.
Heterotopic ossification occurring after the use of commercially available bone morphogenetic proteins has not been widely reported. We describe four cases of heterotopic ossification in patients treated with either recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2 or recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 7. We found that while some patients were asymptomatic, heterotopic ossification which had occurred around a joint often required operative excision with good results.
