Aims. Robotic arm-assisted surgery offers accurate and reproducible guidance in component positioning and assessment of soft-tissue tensioning during knee arthroplasty, but the feasibility and early outcomes when using this technology for revision surgery remain unknown. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic arm-assisted revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to
Aims. The primary aim of this study was to compare the postoperative systemic inflammatory response in conventional jig-based
Aims. The purpose of this study is to determine an individual’s age-specific prevalence of
Aims. Loosening of components after
Aims. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and patterns of neuropathic pain over one year in a cohort of patients with chronic post-surgical pain at three months following
Aims.
Aims. Blood transfusion and postoperative anaemia are complications of
Aims. This study aims to determine the rate of and risk factors for
Aims.
Aims. The aims of this study were to investigate the ability to kneel after
Aims. This multicentre retrospective observational study’s aims were to investigate whether there are differences in the occurrence of radiolucent lines (RLLs) following
Aims. The primary aim was to assess whether robotic
Aims. The aim of this study was to compare a bicruciate-retaining (BCR)
Aims. Despite new technologies for
Aims. The aim of this study was to compare ten-year longitudinal healthcare costs and revision rates for patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and
Aims. Access to
Aims. The success of
Aims. The aim was to assess whether robotic-assisted
Aims. Neither a surgeon’s intraoperative impression nor the parameters of computer navigation have been shown to be predictive of the outcomes following
Aims. This study aimed to evaluate if