A number of causes have been advanced to explain the destructive discovertebral (Andersson) lesions that occur in ankylosing spondylitis, and various treatments have been proposed, depending on the presumed cause. The purpose of this study was to identify the causes of these lesions by defining their clinical and radiological characteristics. We retrospectively reviewed 622 patients with ankylosing spondylitis. In all, 33 patients (5.3%) had these lesions, affecting 100 spinal segments. Inflammatory lesions were found in 91 segments of 24 patients (3.9%) and traumatic lesions in nine segments of nine patients (1.4%). The inflammatory lesions were associated with recent-onset disease; a low modified Stoke ankylosing spondylitis spine score (mSASSS) due to incomplete bony
The aim of this study was to reassess the rate of neurological, psoas-related, and abdominal complications associated with L4-L5 lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) undertaken using a standardized preoperative assessment and surgical technique. This was a multicentre retrospective study involving consecutively enrolled patients who underwent L4-L5 LLIF by seven surgeons at seven institutions in three countries over a five-year period. The demographic details of the patients and the details of the surgery, reoperations and complications, including femoral and non-femoral neuropraxia, thigh pain, weakness of hip flexion, and abdominal complications, were analyzed. Neurological and psoas-related complications attributed to LLIF or posterior instrumentation and persistent symptoms were recorded at one year postoperatively.Aims
Methods
To report the surgical outcome of patients with severe Scheuermann’s kyphosis treated using a consistent technique and perioperative management. We reviewed 88 consecutive patients with a severe Scheuermann's kyphosis who had undergone posterior spinal fusion with closing wedge osteotomies and hybrid instrumentation. There were 55 males and 33 females with a mean age of 15.9 years (12.0 to 24.7) at the time of surgery. We recorded their demographics, spinopelvic parameters, surgical correction, and perioperative data, and assessed the impact of surgical complications on outcome using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire.Aims
Methods
We evaluated the efficacy of anterior fusion alone compared with combined anterior and posterior fusion for the treatment of degenerative cervical kyphosis. Anterior fusion alone was undertaken in 15 patients (group A) and combined anterior and posterior fusion was carried out in a further 15 (group B). The degree and maintenance of the angle of correction, the incidence of graft subsidence, degeneration at adjacent levels and the rate of fusion were assessed radiologically and clinically and the rate of complications recorded. The mean angle of correction in group B was significantly higher than in group A (p = 0.0009). The mean visual analogue scale and the neck disability index in group B was better than in group A (p = 0.043, 0.0006). The mean operation time and the blood loss in B were greater than in group A (p <
0.0001, 0.037). Pseudarthrosis, subsidence of the cage, and problems related to the hardware were more prevalent in group A than in group B (p = 0.034, 0.025, 0.013). Although the combined procedure resulted in a longer operating time and greater blood loss than with anterior fusion alone, our results suggest that for the treatment of degenerative cervical kyphosis the combined approach leads to better maintenance of sagittal alignment, a higher rate of fusion, a lower incidence of complications and a better clinical outcome.
Few studies have examined the order in which
a spinal osteotomy and total hip replacement (THR) are to be performed
for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. We have retrospectively
reviewed 28 consecutive patients with ankylosing spondylitis who
underwent both a spinal osteotomy and a THR from September 2004
to November 2012. In the cohort 22 patients had a spinal osteotomy
before a THR (group 1), and six patients had a THR before a spinal
osteotomy (group 2). The mean duration of follow-up was 3.5 years
(2 to 9). The spinal sagittal Cobb angle of the vertebral osteotomy
segment was corrected from a pre-operative kyphosis angle of 32.4
(SD 15.5°) to a post-operative lordosis 29.6 (SD 11.2°) (p <
0.001). Significant improvements in pain, function and range of
movement were observed following THR. In group 2, two of six patients
had an early anterior dislocation. The spinal osteotomy was performed
two weeks after the THR. At follow-up, no hip has required revision
in either group. Although this non-comparative study only involved
a small number of patients, given our experience, we believe a spinal osteotomy
should be performed prior to a THR, unless the deformity is so severe
that the procedure cannot be performed. Cite this article:
Dysphagia is a common complication of anterior
surgery of the cervical spine. The incidence of post-operative dysphagia
may be as high as 71% within the first two weeks after surgery,
but gradually decreases during the following months. However, 12%
to 14% of patients may have some persistent dysphagia one year after
the procedure. It has been shown that female gender, advanced age,
multilevel surgery, longer operating time and severe pre-operative
neck pain may be risk factors. Although the aetiology remains unclear
and is probably multifactorial, proposed causes include oesophageal
retraction, prominence of the cervical plate and prevertebral swelling.
Recently, pre-operative tracheal traction exercises and the use
of retropharyngeal steroids have been proposed as methods of reducing
post-operative dysphagia. We performed a systematic review to assess the incidence, aetiology,
risk factors, methods of assessment and management of dysphagia
following anterior cervical spinal surgery. Cite this article:
We reviewed seven children with torticollis due to refractory atlanto-axial rotatory fixation who were treated in a halo vest. Pre-operative three-dimensional CT and sagittal CT imaging showed deformity of the superior articular process of C2 in all patients. The mean duration of halo vest treatment was 67 days (46 to 91). The mean follow-up was 34 months (8 to 73); at the latest review six patients demonstrated remodelling of the deformed articular process. The other child, who had a more severe deformity, required C1-2 fusion. We suggest that patients with atlanto-axial rotatory fixation who do not respond to conservative treatment and who have deformity of the superior articular process of C2 should undergo manipulative reduction and halo-vest fixation for two to three months to induce remodelling of the deformed superior articular process before C1-2 fusion is considered.
We present data relating to the Bryan disc arthroplasty for the treatment of cervical spondylosis in 46 patients. Patients with either radiculopathy or myelopathy had a cervical discectomy followed by implantation of a cervical disc prosthesis. Patients were reviewed at six weeks, six months and one year and assessment included three outcome measures, a visual analogue scale (VAS), the short form 36 (SF-36) and the neck disability index (NDI). The results were categorised according to a modification of Odom’s criteria. Radiological evaluation, by an independent radiologist, sought evidence of movement, stability and subsidence of the prosthesis. A highly significant difference was found for all three outcome measurements, comparing the pre-operative with the post-operative values: VAS (Z = 6.42, p <
0.0001), SF-36 (mental component) (Z = −5.02, p <
0.0001), SF-36 (physical component) (Z = −5.00, p <
0.0001) and NDI (Z = 7.03, p <
0.0001). The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis seems reliable and safe in the treatment of patients with cervical spondylosis.