This study reports the ten-year wear rates, incidence of osteolysis, clinical outcomes, and complications of a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing oxidized zirconium (OxZr) versus cobalt-chrome (CoCr) femoral heads with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients undergoing primary THA were recruited from four institutions and prospectively allocated to the following treatment groups: Group A, CoCr femoral head with XLPE liner; Group B, OxZr femoral head with XLPE liner; and Group C, OxZr femoral head with UHMWPE liner. All study patients and assessors recording outcomes were blinded to the treatment groups. The outcomes of 262 study patients were analyzed at ten years’ follow-up.Aims
Methods
Vascular injuries during total hip arthroplasty
(THA) are rare but when they occur, have serious consequences. These have
traditionally been managed with open exploration and repair, but
more recently there has been a trend towards percutaneous endovascular
management. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess
if this change in trend has led to an improvement in the overall
reported rates of morbidity and mortality during the last 22 years
in comparison with the reviews of the literature published previously. We found a total of 61 articles describing 138 vascular injuries
in 124 patients. Injuries because of a laceration were the most
prevalent (n = 51, 44%) and the most common presenting feature,
when recorded, was bleeding (n = 41, 53.3%). Delay in diagnosis
was associated with the type of vascular lesion (p <
0.001) and
the clinical presentation (p = 0.002). Open exploration and repair was the most common form of management,
however percutaneous endovascular intervention was used in one third
of the injuries and more constantly during the last 13 years. The main overall reported complications included death (n = 9,
7.3%), amputation (n = 2, 1.6%), and persistent ischaemia (n = 9,
7.3%). When compared with previous reviews there was a similar rate
of mortality but lower rates of amputation and permanent disability,
especially in patients managed by endovascular strategies. Cite this article:
