Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 83-B, Issue 1 | Pages 103 - 105
1 Jan 2001
Peckett WRC Butler-Manuel A Apthorp LA

Pyomyositis is rarely seen in temperate climates. Typically, it presents with the formation of an abscess requiring surgical drainage and it has been reported as a differential diagnosis for septic arthritis of the hip. We describe the occurrence of pyomyositis of the iliacus muscle in a ten-year-old girl which was diagnosed by MRI and blood culture. Formation of an abscess did not occur despite marked focal inflammation and swelling of the muscle. Conservative treatment with antibiotics alone led to complete clinical and radiological resolution of the infection. We could find no previous description of pyomyositis in a child in the British orthopaedic literature. Orthopaedic surgeons, particularly those with a paediatric interest, should be aware of this condition and its presentation, diagnosis and treatment


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 3 | Pages 584 - 588
1 Mar 2021
Khattak M Vellathussery Chakkalakumbil S Stevenson RA Bryson DJ Reidy MJ Talbot CL George H

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which patient demographics, clinical presentation, and blood parameters vary in Kingella kingae septic arthritis when compared with those of other organisms, and whether this difference needs to be considered when assessing children in whom a diagnosis of septic arthritis is suspected.

Methods

A prospective case series was undertaken at a single UK paediatric institution between October 2012 and November 2018 of all patients referred with suspected septic arthritis. We recorded the clinical, biochemical, and microbiological findings in all patients.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 91-B, Issue 6 | Pages 797 - 802
1 Jun 2009
Jacobsen S Hansson G Nathorst-Westfelt J

We reviewed the clinical and radiological results of six patients who had sustained traumatic separation of the distal epiphysis of the humerus at birth.

The correct diagnosis was made from plain radiographs and often supplemented with ultrasonography, MRI and arthrography. An orthopaedic surgeon saw two patients within two days of birth, and the other four were seen at between nine and 30 days. The two neonates underwent unsuccessful attempts at closed reduction. In the remaining patients, seen after the age of eight days, no attempt at reduction was made. All six displaced fractures were immobilised in a cast with the elbow at 90° of flexion and the forearm pronated.

When seen at a mean of 58 months (16 to 120) after injury, the clinical and radiological results were excellent in five patients, with complete realignment of the injury. In one patient the forearm lay in slightly reduced valgus with the elbow in full extension.

Traumatic separation of the distal epiphysis of the humerus may be missed on the maternity wards and not diagnosed until after discharge from hospital. However, even when no attempt is made to reduce the displaced epiphysis, a good clinical result can be expected.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 5 | Pages 658 - 664
1 May 2006
Lee RS Weitzel S Eastwood DM Monsell F Pringle J Cannon SR Briggs TWR

Osteofibrous dysplasia is an unusual developmental condition of childhood, which almost exclusively affects the tibia. It is thought to follow a slowly progressive course and to stabilise after skeletal maturity. The possible link with adamantinoma is controversial and some authors believe that they are part of one histological process.

We retrospectively reviewed 16 patients who were diagnosed as having osteofibrous dysplasia initially or on the final histological examination. Their management was diverse, depending on the severity of symptoms and the extent of the lesion. Definitive (extraperiosteal) surgery was localised ‘shark-bite’ excision for small lesions in five patients. Extensive lesions were treated by segmental excision and fibular autograft in six patients, external fixation and bone transport in four and proximal tibial replacement in one. One patient who had a fibular autograft required further excision and bone transport for recurrence. Six initially underwent curettage and all had recurrence. There were no recurrences after localised extraperiosteal excision or bone transport. There were three confirmed cases of adamantinoma.

The relevant literature is reviewed. We recommend extraperiosteal excision in all cases of osteofibrous dysplasia, with segmental excision and reconstruction in more extensive lesions.