Talonavicular and subtalar joint fusion through
a medial incision (modified triple arthrodesis) has become an increasingly
popular technique for treating symptomatic
Acquired
Various radiological parameters are used to evaluate a flatfoot
deformity and their measurements may differ. The aims of this study
were to answer the following questions: 1) Which of the 11 parameters
have the best inter- and intraobserver reliability in a standardized
radiological setting? 2) Are pre- and postoperative assessments
equally reliable? 3) What are the identifiable sources of variation? Measurements of the 11 parameters were recorded on anteroposterior
and lateral weight-bearing radiographs of 38 feet before and after
surgery for flatfoot, by three observers with different experience
in foot surgery (A, ten years; B, three years; C, third-year orthopaedic
resident). The inter- and intraobserver reliability was calculated.Aims
Patients and Methods
The last decade has seen a considerable increase
in the use of in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) to treat patients
with end-stage arthritis of the ankle. However, the longevity of
the implants is still far from that of total knee and hip arthroplasties. The aim of this review is to outline a diagnostic and treatment
algorithm for the painful TAA to be used when considering revision
surgery. Cite this article:
We describe a retrospective review of the clinical and radiological parameters of 32 feet in 30 patients (10 men and 20 women) who underwent correction for malalignment of the hindfoot with a modified double arthrodesis through a medial approach. The mean follow-up was 21 months (13 to 37). Fusion was achieved in all feet at a mean of 13 weeks (6 to 30). Apart from the calcaneal pitch angle, all angular measurements improved significantly after surgery. Primary wound healing occurred without complications. The isolated medial approach to the subtalar and talonavicular joints allows good visualisation which facilitated the reduction and positioning of the joints. It was also associated with fewer problems with wound healing than the standard lateral approach.
The foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) has been
evaluated for many conditions of the foot and ankle. We evaluated
its construct validity in 136 patients with osteoarthritis of the
ankle, its content validity in 37 patients and its responsiveness
in 39. Data were collected prospectively from the registry of patients
at our institution. All FAOS subscales were rated relevant by patients. The Pain,
Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life subscales showed
good correlation with the Physical Component score of the Short-Form-12v2.
All subscales except Symptoms were responsive to change after surgery. We concluded that the FAOS is a weak instrument for evaluating
osteoarthritis of the ankle. However, some of the FAOS subscales
have relative strengths that allow for its limited use while we
continue to seek other satisfactory outcome instruments. Cite this article: