Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 5 | Pages 734 - 739
1 Sep 1996
Ring D Waters PM

We reviewed 36 consecutive patients with Monteggia fracture-dislocations of the forearm; 28 had been treated within 24 hours and 8 had been referred a week or more after the initial injury with persisting or recurrent dislocation of the proximal radio-ulnar joint after treatment elsewhere. We treated 15 of the 16 complete fractures and 3 of the 11 incomplete fractures of the ulna by operative fixation. All the early fractures and six of the eight late referrals had good or excellent results. The two poor results were in patients with malalignment and dislocation of the radial head persisting for at least two weeks before definitive treatment. A good outcome after a Monteggia injury in a child requires early diagnosis and prompt, stable, anatomical reduction of the ulnar fracture. In our experience, selective operative fixation of unstable fractures provides reliable reduction and causes few complications


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1582 - 1587
1 Nov 2015
Suzuki T Seki A Nakamura T Ikegami H Takayama S Nakamura M Matsumoto M Sato K

This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of re-dislocation of the radial head after corrective osteotomy for chronic dislocation. A total of 12 children with a mean age of 11 years (5 to 16), with further dislocation of the radial head after corrective osteotomy of the forearm, were followed for a mean of five years (2 to 10). Re-operations were performed for radial head re-dislocation in six children, while the other six did not undergo re-operation (‘non-re-operation group’). The active range of movement (ROM) of their elbows was evaluated before and after the first operation, and at the most recent follow-up.

In the re-operation group, there were significant decreases in extension, pronation, and supination when comparing the ROM following the corrective osteotomy and following re-operation (p < 0.05).

The children who had not undergone re-operation achieved a better ROM than those who had undergone re-operation.

There was a significant difference in mean pronation (76° vs 0°) between the non- re-operation and the re-operation group (p = 0.002), and a trend towards increases in mean flexion (133° vs 111°), extension (0° vs 23°), and supination (62° vs 29°). We did not find a clear benefit for re-operation in children with a re-dislocation following corrective osteotomy for chronic dislocation of the radial head.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1582–7.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 7 | Pages 994 - 996
1 Jul 2005
Bochang C Jie Y Zhigang W Weigl D Bar-On E Katz K

Redisplacement of unstable forearm fractures in plaster is common and may be the result of a number of factors. Little attention has been paid to the influence of immobilisation with the elbow extended versus flexed. We prospectively treated 111 consecutive children from two centres with closed forearm fractures by closed reduction and casting with the elbow either extended (60) in China or flexed (51) in Israel. We compared the outcome of the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of the age of the patients, the site of fracture or the amount of angulation and displacement between the groups. During the first two weeks after reduction, redisplacement occurred in no child immobilised with the elbow extended and nine of 51 children (17.6%) immobilised with the elbow flexed. Immobilisation of unstable forearm fractures with the elbow extended appears to be a safe and effective method of maintaining reduction.