The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were long-term differences in outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) undertaken for acute proximal humeral fracture versus rotator cuff deficiency with a minimum follow-up of five years. This was a prospective cohort study comparing 67 patients with acute complex proximal humeral fracture and 64 patients with irreparable rotator cuff deficiency who underwent primary RSA. In the fracture group, there were 52 (77.6%) females and 15 (22.4%) males, with a mean age of 73.5 years (51 to 85), while in the arthropathy group, there were 43 (67.1%) females and 21 (32.9%) males, with a mean age of 70.6 years (50 to 84). Patients were assessed by the Constant score, University of California Los Angeles shoulder score (UCLA), short version of the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score (QuickDASH), and visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. Radiological evaluation was also performed.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to use national registry database information to estimate cumulative rates and relative risk of revision due to infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We included 17 730 primary shoulder arthroplasties recorded between 2004 and 2013 in The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) data set. With the Kaplan–Meier method, we illustrated the ten-year cumulative rates of revision due to infection and with the Cox regression model, we reported the hazard ratios as a measure of the relative risk of revision due to infection.Aims
Patients and Methods
Patients with a failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have limited salvage options. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of revision RSA when used as a salvage procedure for a failed primary RSA. We reviewed all revision RSAs performed for a failed primary RSA between 2006 and 2012, excluding patients with a follow-up of less than two years. A total of 27 revision RSAs were included in the study. The mean age of the patients at the time of revision was 70 years (58 to 82). Of the 27 patients, 14 (52% were female). The mean follow-up was 4.4 years (2 to 10).Aims
Patients and Methods
The natural history of primary anterior dislocation
of the glenohumeral joint in adolescent patients remains unclear and
there is no consensus for management of these patients. The objectives of this study were to report the natural history
of primary anterior dislocation of the glenohumeral joint in adolescent
patients and to identify the risk factors for recurrent dislocation. We reviewed prospectively-collected clinical and radiological
data on 133 adolescent patients diagnosed with a primary anterior
dislocation of the glenohumeral joint who had been managed non-operatively
at our hospital between 1996 and 2008. There were 115 male (86.5%)
and 18 female patients (13.5%) with a mean age of 16.3 years (13
to 18) and a mean follow-up of 95.2 months (1 to 215). During follow-up, 102 (absolute incidence of 76.7%) patients
had a recurrent dislocation. The median interval between primary
and recurrent dislocation was ten months (95% CI 7.4 to 12.6). Applying
survival analysis the likelihood of having a stable shoulder one
year after the initial injury was 59% (95% CI 51.2 to 66.8), 38%
(95% CI 30.2 to 45.8%) after two years, 21% (95% CI 13.2 to 28.8)
after five years, and 7% (95% CI 1.1 to 12.9) after ten years. Neither
age nor gender significantly predicted recurrent dislocation during
follow-up. We conclude that adolescent patients with a primary anterior
dislocation of the glenohumeral joint have a high rate of recurrent
dislocation, which usually occurs within two years of their initial
injury: these patients should be considered for early operative
stabilisation. Cite this article:
