We assessed the difference in hospital based and early clinical
outcomes between the direct anterior approach and the posterior
approach in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA). The outcome was assessed in 448 (203 males, 245 females) consecutive
patients undergoing unilateral primary THA after the implementation
of an ‘Enhanced Recovery’ pathway. In all, 265 patients (mean age:
71 years (49 to 89); 117 males and 148 females) had surgery using
the direct anterior approach (DAA) and 183 patients (mean age: 70
years (26 to 100); 86 males and 97 females) using a posterior approach.
The groups were compared for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists
grade, body mass index, the side of the operation, pre-operative
Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and attendance at ‘Joint school’. Mean follow-up
was 18.1 months (one to 50).Aims
Patients and Methods
Persistent groin pain after seemingly successful
total hip replacement (THR) appears to have become more common.
Recent studies have indicated a high incidence after metal-on-polyethylene
and metal-on-metal conventional THR and it has been documented in
up to 18% of patients after metal-on-metal resurfacing. There are many
causes, including acetabular loosening, stress fracture, and iliopsoas
tendonitis and impingement. The evaluation of this problem requires
a careful history and examination, plain radiographs and an algorithmic approach
to special diagnostic imaging and tests. Non-operative treatment
is not usually successful. Specific operative treatment depending
on the cause of the pain usually involves revision of the acetabular
component, iliopsoas tenotomy or other procedures, and is usually
successful. Here, an appropriate algorithm is described.
