Aims. It is increasingly appreciated that coordinated regulation of angiogenesis and
Implantation of ultra-purified alginate (UPAL) gel is safe and effective in animal osteochondral defect models. This study aimed to examine the applicability of UPAL gel implantation to acellular therapy in humans with cartilage injury. A total of 12 patients (12 knees) with symptomatic, post-traumatic, full-thickness cartilage lesions (1.0 to 4.0 cm2) were included in this study. UPAL gel was implanted into chondral defects after performing bone marrow stimulation technique, and assessed for up to three years postoperatively. The primary outcomes were the feasibility and safety of the procedure. The secondary outcomes were self-assessed clinical scores, arthroscopic scores, tissue biopsies, and MRI-based estimations.Aims
Methods
Miller-Galante II total knee arthroplasty (MG II TKA) was performed on 32 knees in 30 patients. On both the femoral and tibial components, the fibre-metal area was plasma-sprayed with hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate (HA-TCP). The clinical and radiographic outcome was evaluated. A mean pre-operative knee score of 26.0 ± 18.6 (SD) increased to 97.5 ± 3.5 and a mean pre-operative functional score of 21.7 ± 15.0 (SD) increased to 83.4 ± 12.4 at follow-up of seven years. Clear zones were common around the components at one month post-operatively but had completely disappeared after six months. An autopsy of a patient who underwent MG II TKA with HA-TCP two years previously, showed
A significant percentage of patients remain dissatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether the sequential addition of accelerometer-based navigation for femoral component preparation and sensor-guided ligament balancing improved complication rates, radiological alignment, or patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) compared with a historical control group using conventional instrumentation. This retrospective cohort study included 371 TKAs performed by a single surgeon sequentially. A historical control group, with the use of intramedullary guides for distal femoral resection and surgeon-guided ligament balancing, was compared with a group using accelerometer-based navigation for distal femoral resection and surgeon-guided balancing (group 1), and one using navigated femoral resection and sensor-guided balancing (group 2). Primary outcome measures were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) scores measured preoperatively and at six weeks and 12 months postoperatively. The position of the components and the mechanical axis of the limb were measured postoperatively. The postoperative range of motion (ROM), haematocrit change, and complications were also recorded.Aims
Methods