Aim. Until now, there has been no consensus as to whether stemmed
acetabular components are appropriate for use in patients undergoing
revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) who have major acetabular
defects or pelvic discontinuity. We wished to address this deficiency
in the literature. Patients and Methods. We carried out a retrospective study of 35 patients (six men
and 29 women) with a mean age of 68 years (37 to 87), with major
acetabular defects who underwent revision THA between 2000 and 2012. Results. At a mean follow-up of 63 months (24 to 141), a total of 15 patients
(43%) had required at least one further operation. Six implants
(17%) loosened aseptically, four (11%) were further revised for
infection and two (6%) for technical failure. By taking revision
for any reason as the endpoint, the rate of survival of the implant
was 61% after five years; by taking revision for aseptic loosening
as the end point, it was 78%. The cumulative five-year survival
for aseptic loosening was 94% in patients without pelvic discontinuity,
and 56% in those with pelvic discontinuity. Conclusion. These results indicate a significantly worse survival in patients
with pelvic discontinuity (p = 0.020) and we advise caution in the
use of the
Pelvic reconstruction after the resection of a tumour around
the acetabulum is a challenging procedure due to the complex anatomy
and biomechanics. Several pelvic endoprostheses have been introduced,
but the rates of complication remain high. Our aim was to review
the use of a stemmed acetabular pedestal cup in the management of
these patients. The study involved 48 patients who underwent periacetabular reconstruction
using a stemmed pedestal cup (Schoellner cup; Zimmer Biomet Inc.,
Warsaw, Indiana) between 2000 and 2013. The indications for treatment included
a primary bone tumour in 27 patients and metastatic disease in 21
patients. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was
52 years (16 to 83).Aims
Patients and Methods
The aims of this retrospective study were to report the feasibility
of using 3D-printing technology for patients with a pelvic tumour
who underwent reconstruction. A total of 35 patients underwent resection of a pelvic tumour
and reconstruction using 3D-printed endoprostheses between September
2013 and December 2015. According to Enneking’s classification of
bone defects, there were three Type I lesions, 12 Type II+III lesions,
five Type I+II lesions, two Type I+II+III lesions, ten type I+II+IV
lesions and three type I+II+III+IV lesions. A total of three patients
underwent reconstruction using an iliac prosthesis, 12 using a standard
hemipelvic prosthesis and 20 using a screw-rod connected hemipelvic
prosthesis.Aims
Patients and Methods
