In this cross-over study, we evaluated two types of knee brace commonly used in the conservative treatment of osteoarthritis of the medial compartment. Twelve patients confirmed radiologically as having unilateral osteoarthritis of the medial compartment (Larsen grade 2 to grade 4) were studied. Treatment with a simple hinged brace was compared with that using a valgus corrective brace. Knee kinematics, ground
Surgeons commonly resect additional distal femur during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture, which leads to femoral joint line elevation. There is a paucity of data describing the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion stability and knee kinematics. Thus, the goal of this study was to quantify the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion laxity. Six computational knee models with cadaver-specific capsular and collateral ligament properties were implanted with a posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. A 10° flexion contracture was created in each model to simulate a capsular contracture. Distal femoral resections of + 2 mm and + 4 mm were then simulated for each knee. The knee models were then extended under a standard moment. Subsequently, varus and valgus moments of 10 Nm were applied as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90° at baseline and repeated after each of the two distal resections. Coronal laxity (the sum of varus and valgus angulation with respective maximum moments) was measured throughout flexion.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to compare robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine the changes in the anatomy of the knee and alignment of the lower limb following surgery. An analysis of 38 patients who underwent TKA and 32 who underwent bi-UKA was performed as a secondary study from a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial. CT imaging was used to measure coronal, sagittal, and axial alignment of the knee preoperatively and at three months postoperatively to determine changes in anatomy that had occurred as a result of the surgery. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) was also measured to identify any differences between the two groups.Aims
Methods
Peri-prosthetic patellar fracture following resurfacing
as part of total knee replacement (TKR) is an infrequent yet challenging
complication. This case-control study was performed to identify
clinical, radiological and surgical factors that increase the risk
of developing a spontaneous patellar fracture after TKR. Patellar
fractures were identified in 74 patients (88 knees) from a series
of 7866 consecutive TKRs conducted between 1998 and 2009. After excluding
those with a previous history of extensor mechanism realignment
or a clear traumatic event, a metal-backed patella, any uncemented
component or subsequent infection, the remaining 64 fractures were
compared with a matched group of TKRs with an excellent outcome
defined by the Knee Society score. The mean age of patients with
a fracture was 70 years (51 to 81) at the time of TKR. Patellar
fractures were detected at a mean of 13.4 months (2 to 84) after
surgery. The incidence of patellar fracture was found to be strongly
associated with the number of previous knee operations, greater
pre-operative mechanical malalignment, smaller post-operative patellar
tendon length, thinner post-resection patellar thickness, and a
lower post-operative Insall-Salvati ratio. An understanding of the risk factors associated with spontaneous
patellar fracture following TKR provides a valuable insight into
prevention of this challenging complication.
The aim of this study was to examine the loading
of the other joints of the lower limb in patients with unilateral osteoarthritis
(OA) of the knee. We recruited 20 patients with no other symptoms
or deformity in the lower limbs from a consecutive cohort of patients
awaiting knee replacement. Gait analysis and electromyographic recordings were
performed to determine moments at both knees and hips, and contraction
patterns in the medial and lateral quadriceps and hamstrings bilaterally.
The speed of gait was reduced in the group with OA compared with
the controls, but there were only minor differences in stance times
between the limbs. Patients with OA of the knee had significant
increases in adduction moment impulse at both knees and the contralateral
hip (adjusted p-values: affected knee: p <
0.01, unaffected knee
p = 0.048, contralateral hip p = 0.03), and significantly increased
muscular co-contraction bilaterally compared with controls (all
comparisons for co-contraction, p <
0.01). The other major weight-bearing joints are at risk from abnormal
biomechanics in patients with unilateral OA of the knee. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that patella alta leads to a less favourable situation in terms of patellofemoral contact force, contact area and contact pressure than the normal patellar position, and thereby gives rise to anterior knee pain. A dynamic knee simulator system based on the Oxford rig and allowing six degrees of freedom was adapted in order to simulate and record the dynamic loads during a knee squat from 30° to 120° flexion under physiological conditions. Five different configurations were studied, with variable predetermined patellar heights. The patellofemoral contact force increased with increasing knee flexion until contact occurred between the quadriceps tendon and the femoral trochlea, inducing load sharing. Patella alta caused a delay of this contact until deeper flexion. As a consequence, the maximal patellofemoral contact force and contact pressure increased significantly with increasing patellar height (p <
0.01). Patella alta was associated with the highest maximal patellofemoral contact force and contact pressure. When averaged across all flexion angles, a normal patellar position was associated with the lowest contact pressures. Our results indicate that there is a biomechanical reason for anterior knee pain in patients with patella alta.