Open discectomy (OD) is the standard operation for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), however, has shown similar outcomes to OD and there is increasing interest in this procedure. However despite improved surgical techniques and instrumentation, reoperation and infection rates continue and are reported to be between 6% and 24% and 0.7% and 16%, respectively. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of reoperation and infection within six months of patients being treated for LDH either by OD or PELD. In this retrospective, nationwide cohort study, the Korean National Health Insurance database from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2018 was reviewed. Data were extracted for patients who underwent OD or PELD for LDH without a history of having undergone either procedure during the preceding year. Individual patients were followed for six months through their encrypted unique resident registration number. The primary endpoints were rates of reoperation and infection during the follow-up period. Other risk factors for reoperation and infection were also evalulated.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the
clinical relevance of increased facet joint distraction as a result
of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for trauma. A total of 155 patients (130 men, 25 women. Mean age 42.7 years;
16 to 87) who had undergone ACDF between 1 January 2001 and 1 January
2016 were included in the study. Outcome measures included the Neck
Disability Index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain.
Lateral cervical spine radiographs taken in the immediate postoperative
period were reviewed to compare the interfacet distance of the operated
segment with those of the facet joints above and below.Aims
Patients and Methods
Identifying cervical spine injuries in confused or comatose patients
with multiple injuries provides a diagnostic challenge. Our aim
was to investigate the protocols which are used for the clearance
of the cervical spine in these patients in English hospitals. All hospitals in England with an Emergency Department were asked
about the protocols which they use for assessing the cervical spine.
All 22 Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) and 141 of 156 non-MTCs responded
(response rate 91.5%).Aim
Patients and Methods
