The aim of this study was to report the three-year follow-up for a series of 400 patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the hip, who were randomized to be treated with either a cemented polished tapered hemiarthroplasty or an uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated hemiarthroplasty. The mean age of the patients was 85 years (58 to 102) and 273 (68%) were female. Follow-up was undertaken by a nurse who was blinded to the hemiarthroplasty that was used, at intervals for up to three years from surgery. The short-term follow-up of these patients at a mean of one year has previously been reported.Aims
Methods
A lack of supporting clinical studies have been published to determine the ideal length of intramedullary nail in fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip. Nevertheless, there has been a trend to use shorter intramedullary nails for the internal fixation of trochanteric hip fractures. Our aim was to determine if the length of nail affected the outcome. We randomized 229 patients with a trochanteric hip fracture between two implants: a ‘standard’ nail of 220 mm and a shorter nail of 175 mm, which had decreased proximal angulation (4° vs 7°) and a reduced diameter at the level of the lesser trochanter. Patients were followed up for one year by a nurse blinded to the type of implant used to determine if there were differences in mobility and pain with two nail designs. Pain was assessed on a scale of 1 (none) to 8 (severe and constant) and mobility on a scale of 1 (full mobility) to 9 (immobile).Aims
Methods
Debate continues about whether it is better to use a cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty to treat a displaced intracapsular fracture of the hip. The aim of this study was to attempt to resolve this issue for contemporary prostheses. A total of 400 patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the hip were randomized to receive either a cemented polished tapered stem hemiarthroplasty or an uncemented Furlong hydroxyapatite-coated hemiarthroplasty. Follow-up was conducted by a nurse blinded to the implant at set intervals for up to one year from surgery.Aims
Methods
To compare the outcomes for trochanteric fractures treated with
a sliding hip screw (SHS) or a cephalomedullary nail. A total of 400 patients with a trochanteric hip fracture were
randomised to receive a SHS or a cephalomedullary nail (Targon PFT).
All surviving patients were followed up to one year from injury.
Functional outcome was assessed by a research nurse blinded to the
implant used.Aims
Patients and Methods
A consecutive series of 320 patients with an
intracapsular fracture of the hip treated with a dynamic locking
plate (Targon Femoral Neck (TFN)) were reviewed. All surviving patients
were followed for a minimum of two years. During the follow-up period
109 patients died. There were 112 undisplaced fractures, of which three (2.7%) developed
nonunion or re-displacement and five (4.5%) developed avascular
necrosis of the femoral head. Revision to an arthroplasty was required
for five patients (4.5%). A further six patients (5.4%) had elective
removal of the plate and screws. There were 208 displaced fractures, of which 32 (15.4%) developed
nonunion or re-displacement and 23 (11.1%) developed avascular necrosis.
A further four patients (1.9%) developed a secondary fracture around
the TFN. Revision to a hip replacement was required for 43 patients
(20.7%) patients and a further seven (3.3%) had elective removal
of the plate and screws. It is suggested that the stronger distal fixation combined with
rotational stability may lead to a reduced incidence of complications
related to the healing of the fracture when compared with other
contemporary fixation devices but this needs to be confirmed in
further studies. Cite this article:
