Aims. Paediatric pelvic ring fractures are rare but severe injuries, presenting significant treatment challenges. This study aimed to analyze patient characteristics and explore trends in incidence, treatment methods, and mortality associated with these injuries. Methods. This multicentre, retrospective cohort study analyzed paediatric patients (aged ≤ 18 years) with pelvic ring fractures treated between 2001 and 2021 at two level 1 trauma centres. Data on patient demographics, injury characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes were collected, and visual trend analysis was conducted to identify patterns. Results. A total of 157 patients with pelvic ring fractures were included. The median age was 15 years (IQR 12 to 17), with 52% (n = 81) being female. Traffic accidents were the leading cause of injury, accounting for 68% of cases (n = 106). Concomitant injuries were observed in 83% of patients (n = 131). The one-year mortality rate was 11.5%, with 76% of deaths occurring within 48 hours of admission, primarily due to traumatic brain injury (53%). Most patients (60%) were treated nonoperatively, while 48% of surgically treated patients underwent internal fixation without prior external fixation. Visual trend analysis revealed an increase in the absolute number of paediatric pelvic ring fractures over time, though no significant shift towards surgical treatment was observed. Among surgically treated patients, there was a trend towards open reduction and internal fixation rather than external fixation as definitive treatment. Nonoperative treatment was more common in children (69%) than in adolescents (55%). For surgical cases, external fixation was preferred in children (44%), while ORIF was more common in adolescents (53%). Conclusion. The incidence of paediatric pelvic ring fractures has increased over time, with a high mortality rate largely attributable to severe neurotrauma. There has been a shift towards surgical treatment without prior external fixation, with differences noted in the treatment approaches between children and adolescents, particularly in surgical fixation methods. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(3):254–263

Aims. Due to the recent rapid expansion of scooter sharing companies, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of electric scooter (e-scooter) injuries. Our purpose was to conduct a systematic review to characterize the demographic characteristics, most common injuries, and management of patients injured from electric scooters. Methods. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using variations of the term “electric scooter”. We excluded studies conducted prior to 2015, studies with a population of less than 50, case reports, and studies not focused on electric scooters. Data were analyzed using t-tests and p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results. We studied 5,705 patients from 34 studies. The mean age was 33.3 years (SD 3.5), and 58.3% (n = 3,325) were male. The leading mechanism of injury was falling (n = 3,595, 74.4%). Injured patients were more likely to not wear a helmet (n = 2,114; 68.1%; p < 0.001). The most common type of injury incurred was bony injuries (n = 2,761, 39.2%), of which upper limb fractures dominated (n = 1,236, 44.8%). Head and neck injuries composed 22.2% (n = 1,565) of the reported injuries, including traumatic brain injuries (n = 455; 2.5%), lacerations/abrasions/contusions (n = 500; 7.1%), intracerebral brain haemorrhages (n = 131; 1.9%), and concussions (n = 255; 3.2%). Standard radiographs comprised most images (n = 2,153; 57.7%). Most patients were treated and released without admission (n = 2,895; 54.5%), and 17.2% (n = 911) of injured patients required surgery. Qualitative analyses of the cost of injury revealed that any intoxication was associated with higher billing costs. Conclusion. The leading injuries from e-scooters are upper limb fractures. Falling was the leading mechanism of injury, and most patients did not wear a helmet. Future research should focus on injury characterization, treatment, and cost. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9):674–683