Objectives. To define Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds
for the Oxford hip score (OHS) and Oxford knee score (OKS) at mid-term
follow-up. Methods. In a prospective multicentre cohort study, OHS and OKS were collected
at a mean follow-up of three years (1.5 to 6.0), combined with a
numeric rating scale (NRS) for satisfaction and an external validation
question assessing the patient’s willingness to undergo surgery
again. A total of 550 patients underwent total hip replacement (THR)
and 367 underwent total knee replacement (TKR). Results. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves identified a PASS
threshold of 42 for the OHS after THR and 37 for the OKS after TKR.
THR patients with an OHS ≥ 42 and TKR patients with an OKS ≥ 37
had a higher NRS for satisfaction and a greater likelihood of being
willing to undergo surgery again. Conclusions. PASS thresholds appear larger at mid-term follow-up than at six
months after surgery. With- out
Objectives. We aimed first to summarise minimal clinically important differences
(MCIDs) after total hip (THR) or knee replacement (TKR) in health-related
quality of life (HRQoL), measured using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36).
Secondly, we aimed to improve the precision of MCID estimates by
means of meta-analysis. Methods. We conducted a systematic review of English and non-English articles
using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1960–2011),
EMBASE (1991–2011), Web of Science, Academic Search Premier and
Science Direct. Bibliographies of included studies were searched
in order to find additional studies. Search terms included MCID
or minimal clinically important change, THR or TKR and Short-Form
36. We included longitudinal studies that estimated MCID of SF-36
after THR or TKR. Results. Three studies met our inclusion criteria, describing a distinct
study population: primary THR, primary TKR and revision THR. No
synthesis of study results can be given. Conclusions. Although we found MCIDs in HRQoL after THR or TKR have limited
precision and are not
