Approximately 10% to 20% of knee arthroplasty patients are not satisfied with the result, while a clear indication for revision surgery might not be present. Therapeutic options for these patients, who often lack adequate quadriceps strength, are limited. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of a novel rehabilitation protocol that combines low-load resistance training (LL-RT) with blood flow restriction (BFR). Between May 2022 and March 2024, we enrolled 45 dissatisfied knee arthroplasty patients who lacked any clear indication for revision to this prospective cohort study. All patients were at least six months post-surgery and had undergone conventional physiotherapy previously. The patients participated in a supervised LL-RT combined with BFR in 18 sessions. Primary assessments included the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); Knee Society Score: satisfaction (KSSs); the EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L); and the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS). Functionality was assessed using the six-minute walk Test (6MWT) and the 30-second chair stand test (30CST). Follow-up timepoints were at baseline, six weeks, three months, and six months after the start.Aims
Methods
In the last decade, interest in partial knee arthroplasties and bicruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties has increased. In addition, patient-related outcomes and functional results such as range of movement and ambulation may be more promising with less invasive procedures such as bicompartmental arthroplasty (BCA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes after a third-generation patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) combined with a medial or lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) at mid- to long-term follow-up. A total of 57 procedures were performed. In 45 cases, a PFA was associated with a medial UKA and, in 12, with a lateral UKA. Patients were followed with validated patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), EuroQoL Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)), the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and radiological analysis.Aims
Methods
We have compared the time to recovery of isokinetic
quadriceps strength after total knee replacement (TKR) using three
different lengths of incision in the quadriceps. We prospectively
randomised 60 patients into one of the three groups according to
the length of incision in the quadriceps above the upper border
of the patella (2 cm, 4 cm or 6 cm). The strength of the knees was
measured pre-operatively and every month post-operatively until
the peak quadriceps torque returned to its pre-operative level. There was no significant difference in the mean operating time,
blood loss, hospital stay, alignment or pre-operative isokinetic
quadriceps strength between the three groups. Using the Kaplan–Meier
method, group A had a similar mean recovery time to group B (2.0
± 0.2 vs 2.5 ± 0.2 months, p = 0.176). Group C
required a significantly longer recovery time (3.4 ± 0.3 months)
than the other groups (p <
0.03). However, there were no significant differences
in the mean Oxford knee scores one year post-operatively between
the groups. We conclude that an incision of up to 4 cm in the quadriceps
does not delay the recovery of its
